Hi Yunze, Thank you for your suggestion, I will keep that in mind during implementation. -- Best Regards！ crossoverJie
Yunze Xu <x...@apache.org> 于2024年8月7日周三 15:14写道： > +1 (binding) > > BTW, I don't think such a proposal needs a formal PIP. It only affects > the APIs in the `impl` package that is not guaranteed to be stable. > > If you're going to grant the stability guarantee on the `SendCallback` > interface, please add the corresponding `InterfaceStability` > annotation in the implementation PR. > > Thanks, > Yunze > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 3:44 PM Jie crossover <crossover...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > bump > > -- > > Best Regards！ > > crossoverJie > > > > > > 太上玄元道君 <dao...@apache.org> 于2024年7月8日周一 14:24写道： > > > > > bump > > > > > > Jie crossover <crossover...@gmail.com> 于2024年6月24日周一 10:01写道： > > > > > > > Hi, Pulsar Community. > > > > > > > > I would like to start the voting thread for PIP-363: Add callback > > > > parameters to the method: > > > > org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.SendCallback.sendComplete. > > > > > > > > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22940 > > > > Discussion thread: > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8pgmsvx1bxz4z1w8prpvpnfpt1kb57c9 > > > > -- > > > > Best Regards！ > > > > crossoverJie > > > > > > > >
