Hi - I see from the last meeting the following agenda:
> 2024/02/29 > Attendees: > Lari Hotari > Jonas > Kevin Lu > Frank Kelly > Asaf Mesika > Chris Bono > David Jensen > > Agenda > PIP-341: Pluggable client metrics tracker interface > 1. Should the OTel implementation be included in the PIP, or as a separate > follow-up PIP? > 2. Do we want to maintain compatibility with the existing stats system (ex. > the public Producer /Consumer’s getStats() API), or keep the tracker > interface completely separate (and deprecate the old system)? The current PIP > attempts to maintain full compatibility, but I have detailed some of the > challenges/solutions for maintaining compatibility with the old system. > Here is the draft https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22145 > <https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22145> > Trivy container scan PR (https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22063 > <https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22063>) > Pulsar-manager > Release notes / Upgrade notes . Making it easier to upgrade to newer Pulsar > versions > Cherry-pick vs cascade branch merge I do not recall that any of this discussion made it to the mailing list. It looks like decisions are being made in the meeting. For example: 1. Is there anything in the PIP-341 discussion that could not have been brought to the mailing list in a [DISCUSS] PIP-341 thread? The only thing I can find on a mailing list is this thread. https://lists.apache.org/thread/nott6fyo2vylv1d7nq3zwhsojm05fkgr <https://lists.apache.org/thread/nott6fyo2vylv1d7nq3zwhsojm05fkgr> 2, Trivy - I don’t see it brought back: https://lists.apache.org/list?*@pulsar.apache.org:dfr=2024-1-1|dto=2024-3-6:Trivy <https://lists.apache.org/list?*@pulsar.apache.org:dfr=2024-1-1%7Cdto=2024-3-6:Trivy> 3. Pulsar Manager - Nothing brought back to the mailing list: https://lists.apache.org/list?dev@pulsar.apache.org:dfr=2024-1-1|dto=2024-3-6:pulsar%20manager <https://lists.apache.org/list?dev@pulsar.apache.org:dfr=2024-1-1%7Cdto=2024-3-6:pulsar%20manager> 4. Cherry pick question came back as this wall of text: https://lists.apache.org/thread/j6qvt45rndnvjypcmqxsfmddqt41bxjv <https://lists.apache.org/thread/j6qvt45rndnvjypcmqxsfmddqt41bxjv> I can see how this can look to an outsider like decisions are being made in a non-open manner in a synchronous meeting. If you wish to continue with this meeting then please publish the agenda in advance to the Mailing List! Best, Dave
