Hi Xiangying, Shouldn't the solution to the issue mentioned in #21564 [0] mostly be around validating that topic level replication clusters are subset of namespace level replication clusters? It would be a completely compatible change as even today the case where a topic has a cluster not defined in namespaces's replication-clusters doesn't really work. And users can anyway go and update the namespace's cluster list to add the missing cluster.
As Rajan also mentioned, allowed-clusters field has a different meaning/purpose. Regards On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:56 AM Xiangying Meng <xiangy...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, Pulsar Community > > I drafted a proposal to make the configuration of clusters at the namespace > level clearer. This helps solve the problem of geo-replication not working > correctly at the topic level. > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21648 > > I'm looking forward to hearing from you. > > BR > Xiangying > -- Girish Sharma
