+1 (binding) And please also update the `# Backward & Forward Compatibility` section as Enrico mentioned.
Regards, Penghui On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 12:47 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > It will be important to add tests about rolling back to the previous > version of Pulsar and/or clusters with mixed versions of the brokers > (during rolling upgrades). > The old version should not complain about the new field added. > Maybe you can add a note in the PIP > > Enrico > > Il Mer 15 Nov 2023, 00:35 Shen Liu <liushen...@126.com> ha scritto: > > > Hi community, > > > > This thread is to start a vote for PIP-317: Add `bookkeeperDeleted` field > > to show whether a ledger is deleted from the Bookie while using tiered > > storage. > > > > > > > > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21521 > > > > Discussion thread: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/9kjgg06oj384myxqls73dwn840thtrrc > > > > Releted PR/issue: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/20833 > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best Regards, > > Shen Liu >
