> I think Java 21 can open the door for Virtual Threads[1]. Yep. This should be a good motivation for using JDK 21.
We may start a survey in the community a few months later for JDK 21 feedback (as we /will/ switch the runtime to JDK 21 in Docker) and try to switch the toolkit. Best, tison. Zixuan Liu <node...@gmail.com> 于2023年10月19日周四 10:56写道： > +1 for compatibility with Java 21. > > Next step: Migrating the Pulsar Server runtime to Java 21 from Java 17 > in the Docker image and CI. Pulsar Client/Admin continues to use Java > 8. > > Thanks, > Zixuan > > Lari Hotari <lhot...@apache.org> 于2023年10月18日周三 06:02写道： > > > > Dear Pulsar community, > > > > Java 21 was released on September 19th and has now become the current > Java LTS release. > > > > I've begun preparations in the Pulsar code base to allow for Java 21 to > be used as the development runtime for compiling the code and running tests > in the master branch. This is a proactive measure to gear up for Java 21 > without committing to the switch just yet. It will help us understand the > necessary changes when we are able to compile the code and run all tests > with Java 21. > > > > For instance, I initiated the process with the following PRs: > > - Upgrade Mockito to 5.6.0 to support Java 21 [1] > > - Upgrade Gradle Enterprise Maven Extension to support Java 21 [2] > > After these are merged, it should be possible to start running tests > with Java 21 to see what is possibly broken and continue iterating. > > Moreover, the upgrade to Lombok 1.18.30 for Java 21 support has already > been merged [3]. > > > > Java 17 has been the recommended runtime for Pulsar server components > since the Pulsar 2.11 release [4]. Meanwhile, the Pulsar client continues > to be supported on Java 8+. > > > > I would like to initiate discussions about making Java 21 the > recommended and default runtime for Pulsar server components. Note that > there will be no change to the Pulsar client, which will remain on Java 8+. > > > > I guess we could come up with a PIP to document the decision once we > have had this discussion. > > > > Do you think we can target the switch from Java 17 to Java 21 for the > Pulsar 3.2 release? > > Could anyone update me on the current schedule for Pulsar 3.2? > > > > -Lari > > > > [1] - https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21385 > > [2] - https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21384 > > [3] - https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21278 > > [4] - > https://github.com/apache/pulsar#pulsar-runtime-java-version-recommendation >
