Thanks for your participants!

The release is moved to
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/pulsar/pulsar-dotpulsar-3.0.0.
Here are several follow-ups for the next release:

* NOTICE file - Fixed by https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/pull/174
.
* Write a RELEASE guide - I'll summarize to actions I did in this release.
* Automaze releases - https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/117
* Binary release - @blankenstei...@apache.org <blankenstei...@apache.org>
told me that releasing nuget package to SVN is meaningless. We may publish
an X.Y.Z-rcN version on NuGet as a staged one for verification. And publish
an X.Y.Z version on NuGet as a formal one when the vote is passed.

Best,
tison.


mattison chao <mattisonc...@gmail.com> 于2023年9月11日周一 13:01写道:

> +1 (binding)
>
> • Checked signature and checksums
> • Built the client from the source
> • Ran basic example.
>
>
> Best,
> Mattison
> On 8 Sep 2023 at 17:57 +0800, tison <wander4...@gmail.com>, wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > I checked
> >
> > - Signature and checksums match
> > - Build the client from the source
> > - Run examples
> >
> > Best,
> > tison.
> >
> >
> > Yunze Xu <x...@apache.org> 于2023年9月8日周五 01:15写道:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > - Verified signature and checksums
> > > - Build from source with dotnet 7.0.400 on Windows 11
> > > - Run the example by adding the dotpulsar 3.0.0 dependency
> > >
> > > But I think there are some points to improve with the document. I'm
> > > new to the dotnet CLI though I have some experiences of C# a few years
> > > ago. I created the project via Visual Studio. However, when I tried to
> > > add the dependency via `dotnet add` command, I found it failed with a
> > > project template created by Visual Studio. Eventually I have to create
> > > and run a project via dotnet CLI:
> > >
> > > ```
> > > cd project-dir
> > > dotnet new console
> > > dotnet add package DotPulsar --version 3.0.0
> > > # Edit the Program.cs
> > > dotnet build
> > > dotnet run
> > > ```
> > >
> > > It would be helpful to provide more guide, even links to existings
> > > tutorial from MSDN.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Yunze
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 3:51 PM Zike Yang <z...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > - Verified signature and checksums
> > > > > - Install the nupkg file
> > > > > - Build the client from the source
> > > > > - Run examples
> > > > >
> > > > > But I find that the dotpulsar 3.0.0 has already been published to
> the
> > > > > nuget.org: https://www.nuget.org/packages/DotPulsar/3.0.0
> > > > >
> > > > > BR,
> > > > > Zike Yang
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Sep 3, 2023 at 11:48 AM tison <wander4...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is the first release candidate for Apache DotPulsar,
> version
> > > 3.0.0.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It fixes the following issues:
> > > > > > >
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/compare/2.11.1...3.0.0
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please download the source files and review this release
> candidate:
> > > > > > > - Download the source package, verify shasum and asc
> > > > > > > - Follow the README.md to build and run the DotPulsar.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> majority
> > > > > > > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Source files:
> > > > > > >
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pulsar/pulsar-dotpulsar-3.0.0-candidate-1/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Pulsar's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> release:
> > > > > > > https://downloads.apache.org/pulsar/KEYS
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The tag to be voted upon:
> > > > > > > v3.0.0
> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/releases/tag/3.0.0
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
> version
> > > 3.0.0,
> > > > > > > as follows:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
> comments)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > tison.
> > >
>

Reply via email to