We're not dropping. We're allowing both. Quoting from PIP below. Are you ok with this, Enrico? Again - we're trying this out, and we'll iterate after we feel this for a while.
1. People discuss using PR comments, each is its own-threaded comment. General comments can be made both as replies in the mailing list or as general comment in the PR. After 10 PIPs in this way we’ll be able to see what people gravitate towards and what’s more convenient and consider refining that. On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 8:55 AM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dave, > I don't think that we are dropping the discussion on the mailing list. > In that case I would cast a -1. > > Enrico > > Il giorno mar 16 mag 2023 alle ore 06:27 Dave Fisher > <wave4d...@comcast.net> ha scritto: > > > > -0 (binding) having discussions on the mailing list makes it much easier > to understand decisions years in the future. Just yesterday I reviewed > email threads in another project from 16 years ago. > > > > Best, > > Dave > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On May 10, 2023, at 3:52 AM, Asaf Mesika <asaf.mes...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm starting the vote process for PIP-265. > > > > > > Link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/20207 > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Asaf > > >
