I cherry picked [0] because it is a very minor change that is required to make PIP 257 (a PIP introduced in 3.0.0) work for the function worker deploying functions with alternative authentication data. The change is covered by a test and only removes a null check that was creating inconsistent results. I request that we keep this commit in the release.
Thanks, Michael [0] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/commit/0df741259505b9189147d72c6f013b2c18f0436c On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 12:37 AM Zike Yang <z...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi, all > > We found that there were a lot of commits that were cherry-picked to > branch-3.0 without any discussion or notification to reach a > consensus. Some PRs marked for the 3.1.0 milestone were also > cherry-picked into branch-3.0. Here are the corresponding > cherry-picked commits: > * > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/commit/3da39b2e1553cecbc6d6b85e8bc7844f611d5637 > * > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/commit/e248e14473142765db1df324c20a081a2422980e > * > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/commit/e27abe9e128fb71b65ffe06417574c9a7f3facbd > * > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/commit/e1d63990644700bf61b3d7af1ef6d4d62145c2bb > * > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/commit/ff59240165c73a9c3a3dcca20702ab44b0b18d33 > * > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/commit/49480ea558e647169e8df01bfd2e871a5386e19e > * > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/commit/1d1a3ef864a65c995ceda4b7875ed934c2574298 > * > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/commit/0df741259505b9189147d72c6f013b2c18f0436c > * > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/commit/d05871213adc351d4c718c2a6fb0909b01d279ff > > According to our release policy[0] and the code freeze notification > [1], all commits that need to be cherry-picked into branch-3.0 will > require reaching the consensus before cherry-picking. > Before cherry-picking the commit, we need to provide the context for > why it needs to be cherry-picked into branch-3.0. Then mark it with > the 3.0.0 milestone and raise the discussion to reach a consensus. > > I would like to start a discussion regarding the context for the above > cherry-picked commits. Should we include them in Pulsar 3.0? > If there is still no consensus for the above commits, we may need to > revert them before the RC3. > > If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to let > us know. Thanks for your cooperation. > > [0] https://pulsar.apache.org/contribute/release-policy/#release-cycles > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/43d28rtzsx7x3o4zd523jr5dmnczrn4h > > Thanks, > Zike Yang
