The proposal sounds really useful, especially for automated testing.
+1

Enrico

Il giorno sab 15 apr 2023 alle ore 12:07 Xiangying Meng
<xiangy...@apache.org> ha scritto:
>
> Dear Girish,
>
> Thank you for your response and suggestion to extend the use of the
> `boolean force` flag for namespaces and tenants.
> I understand that the `force` flag is already implemented for deleting
> topics, namespaces, and tenants,
> and it provides a consistent way to perform these actions.
>
> However, the current goal is to keep the tenant and namespace intact while
> cleaning up their contents.
> In other words, I want to have a way to remove all topics within a
> namespace or all namespaces and topics
> within a tenant without actually deleting the namespace or tenant itself.
>
> To achieve this goal, I proposed adding a `clear` command for `namespaces`
> and `tenants`.
>
> This approach would allow users to keep the tenant and namespace structures
> in place
> while cleaning up their contents.
> I hope this clarifies my intention, and I would like to hear your thoughts
> on this proposal.
>
> Best regards,
> Xiangying
>
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 5:49 PM Girish Sharma <scrapmachi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Xiangying,
> > This indeed is a cumbersome task to delete a filled namespace or tenant. We
> > face this challenge in our organization where we use the multi-tenancy
> > feature of pulsar heavily.
> >
> > I would like to suggest a different command to do this though.. Similar to
> > how you cannot delete a topic without deleting its
> > subscribers/producers/consumers, unless we use the `boolean force` flag.
> > Why not extend this to namespace and tenant as well and let the force param
> > do the cleanup (which your suggested `clear` command would do).
> >
> > As of today, using force to delete a namespace just returns 405 saying
> > broker doesn't allow force delete of namespace containing topics.
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 3:07 PM Xiangying Meng <xiangy...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Apache Pulsar Community,
> > >
> > > I hope this email finds you well.I am writing to suggest a potential
> > > improvement to the Pulsar-admin tool,
> > >  which I believe could simplify the process of cleaning up tenants and
> > > namespaces in Apache Pulsar.
> > >
> > > Currently, cleaning up all the namespaces and topics within a tenant or
> > > cleaning up all the topics within a namespace requires several manual
> > > steps,
> > > such as listing the namespaces, listing the topics, and then deleting
> > each
> > > topic individually.
> > > This process can be time-consuming and error-prone for users.
> > >
> > > To address this issue, I propose the addition of a "clear" parameter to
> > the
> > > Pulsar-admin tool,
> > > which would automate the cleanup process for tenants and namespaces.
> > Here's
> > > a conceptual implementation:
> > >
> > > 1. To clean up all namespaces and topics within a tenant:
> > > ``` bash
> > > pulsar-admin tenants clear <tenant-name>
> > > ```
> > > 2. To clean up all topics within a namespace:
> > > ```bash
> > > pulsar-admin namespaces clear <tenant-name>/<namespace-name>
> > > ```
> > >
> > > By implementing these new parameters, users would be able to perform
> > > cleanup operations more efficiently and with fewer manual steps.
> > > I believe this improvement would greatly enhance the user experience when
> > > working with Apache Pulsar.
> > >
> > > I'd like to discuss the feasibility of this suggestion and gather
> > feedback
> > > from the community.
> > > If everyone agrees, I can work on implementing this feature and submit a
> > > pull request for review.
> > >
> > > Looking forward to hearing your thoughts on this.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Xiangying
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Girish Sharma
> >

Reply via email to