If the code isn't being used or maintained, I support removing it. The code will be available in the git history in case someone decides to resurrect it.
Thanks, Michael On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 7:14 AM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yunze, > > Il Mar 4 Apr 2023, 09:57 Yunze Xu <y...@streamnative.io.invalid> ha scritto: > > > If the flaky tests were the only concern, I think we can just disable > > these tests. > > > My concern is not about the the flaky tests but a out maintenance of dead > code. > > > > Whatever, this config in `ServiceConfiguration` has > > existed for a long time, though when it was introduced, the PIP rule > > was not clear so there is no PIP for it. > > > > I don't think it would work well in production, given the amount of > flakyness in the tests and the fact that nobody ever asked questions about > it. > > > This is why I propose to drop the code now in Pulsar 3.0 > > > Enrico > > > > > Thanks, > > Yunze > > > > On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 3:09 PM Gavin gao <gaozhang...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > +1, I totally agree with this idea. > > > > > > Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> 于2023年4月4日周二 14:47写道： > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > It has been a long time that we have in the Pulsar code a new > > > > experimental Dispatcher implementation named StreamingDispatcher. > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/9056 > > > > > > > > There are many flaky tests about that feature and I believe that it > > > > has never been used in Production by anyone, because it happened a few > > > > times that we did some changes in the regular Dispatcher and > > > > introduced bugs on the StreamingDispacther (usually manifested as > > > > flaky tests) > > > > > > > > > > > > I propose to drop the StreamingDispatcher code for Pulsar 3.0. > > > > I don't think we need a PIP for this, it is an experimental code that > > > > was never delivered as a production ready feature. > > > > > > > > If anyone is aware of users please chime in. > > > > > > > > If anyone wants to sponsor that feature and objects in removing this > > > > dead code (that we still have to maintain) please help us in > > > > completing the feature. > > > > > > > > On paper it is a very appealing feature, and I am disappointed in > > dropping > > > > it. > > > > On the other hand, this is dead code that we have to maintain with zero > > > > benefit > > > > > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > > > > > Enrico > > > > > >
