Is the PIP updated with all comments?

On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 8:59 AM 太上玄元道君 <dao...@apache.org> wrote:

> > backlogQuotaLimitSize
> > should be `backlogQuotaSizeBytes`
>
> > backlogQuotaLimitTime
> > should be `backlogQuotaTimeSeconds`
>
> > So you need to rename the metric.
> > "pulsar_storage_backlog_quota_count" -->
> > `pulsar_storage_backlog_eviction_count`
>
> > the topic's existing subscription.
> > "subscription" --> "subscription*s*"
>
> > Number of backlog quota happends.
> > Number of times backlog evictions happened due to exceeding backlog quota
> > (either time or size).
>
> Accepted, if there is no more need to change, I'll start the vote next
> week.
>
> Thanks,
> Tao Jiuming
>
>
> Asaf Mesika <asaf.mes...@gmail.com> 于2023年3月7日周二 00:02写道:
>
> > >
> > > Pulsar has a feature called backlog quota (place link).
> >
> > You need to place a link :)
> >
> > Expose pulsar_storage_backlog_quota_count in the topic leve
> >
> > You already have "pulsar_storage_backlog_size", so why do you need this
> > metric for?
> >
> > backlogQuotaLimitSize
> >
> > should be `backlogQuotaSizeBytes`
> >
> > backlogQuotaLimitTime
> >
> > should be `backlogQuotaTimeSeconds`
> >
> > What about goal no.4? Expose oldest unacknowledged message subscription
> > name?
> >
> > IMO, metrics are like API - perhaps indicate the change there as well
> >
> > Record the event when dropBacklogForSizeLimit
> > > <
> >
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/service/BacklogQuotaManager.java#L121
> > >
> > >  or dropBacklogForTimeLimit
> > > <
> >
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/service/BacklogQuotaManager.java#L194
> >
> > is
> > > going to invoked.
> >
> >
> > Oh, now I get it.
> > So you need to rename the metric.
> > "pulsar_storage_backlog_quota_count" -->
> > `pulsar_storage_backlog_eviction_count`
> >
> >
> > > the topic's existing subscription.
> >
> > "subscription" --> "subscription*s*"
> >
> > Number of backlog quota happends.
> >
> > Number of times backlog evictions happened due to exceeding backlog quota
> > (either time or size).
> >
> >
> > >    1. Find the backlog subscriptions
> > >    After received the alarm, users could request
> > Topics#getStats(topicName,
> > >    true/false, true, true)
> > >    <
> >
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/pulsar-client-admin-api/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/client/admin/Topics.java#L1139
> >
> > to
> > >    get the topic stats, and find which subscriptions are in backlog.
> > >    Pulsar exposed backlogSize and earliestMsgPublishTimeInBacklog in
> the
> > >    subscription level, and we will expose backlogQuotaLimitSize and
> > >    backlogQuotaLimitTime in the topic level, so users could find which
> > >    subscriptions in backlog easily.
> > >
> > > I wrote how it should be done IMO in a previous email.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 1:20 PM 太上玄元道君 <dao...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Aasf,
> > > I've updated the PIP, PTAL
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Tao Jiuming
> > >
> > > Asaf Mesika <asaf.mes...@gmail.com> 于2023年3月5日周日 21:00写道:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 12:57 PM 太上玄元道君 <dao...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > I  think you should fix this explanation:
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks! I would like to copy the context you provide to the PIP
> > > > motivation,
> > > > > your description is more detailed, so developers don't have to go
> > > through
> > > > > the code.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sure
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Today the quota is checked periodically, right? So that's how the
> > > > > operator
> > > > > > knows the cost in terms of I/O is limited.
> > > > > > Now you are adding one additional I/O per collection, every 1 min
> > by
> > > > > > default. That's a lot perhaps. How long is the check interval
> > today?
> > > > >
> > > > > Actually, I don't want to introduce additional costs, I thought we
> > > > > could cache its result, so that it won't introduce additional
> costs.
> > > > > It may be that I did not make it clear in the PIP and caused this
> > > > > misunderstanding, sorry.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ok, just to verify: You plan to modify the code that runs
> periodically
> > > the
> > > > backlog quota check, so the result will be cached there? This way
> when
> > > you
> > > > pull that information from that code every 1min to expose it as a
> > metric
> > > it
> > > > will have 0 I/O cost?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > The user today can calculate quota used for size based limit,
> since
> > > > there
> > > > > > are two metrics that are exposed today on a topic level: "
> > > > > > pulsar_storage_backlog_quota_limit" and
> > > "pulsar_storage_backlog_size".
> > > > > You
> > > > > > can just divide the two to get a percentage.
> > > > > > For the time-based limit, the only metric exposed today is quota
> > > > itself ,
> > > > > "
> > > > > > pulsar_storage_backlog_quota_limit_time".
> > > > >
> > > > > I only noticed `pulsar_storage_backlog_size` but missed
> > > > > `pulsar_storage_backlog_quota_limit` and
> > > > > `pulsar_storage_backlog_quota_limit_time`. Many thanks for your
> > > reminder.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > So, in this condition, we already have the following topic-level
> > > metrics:
> > > > > `pulsar_storage_backlog_size`: The total backlog size of the topics
> > of
> > > > this
> > > > > topic owned by this broker (in bytes).
> > > > > `pulsar_storage_backlog_quota_limit`: The total amount of the data
> in
> > > > this
> > > > > topic that limits the backlog quota (bytes).
> > > > > `pulsar_storage_backlog_quota_limit_time`: The backlog quota limit
> in
> > > > > time(seconds). (This metric does not exists in the doc, need to
> > > improve)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > We just need to add a new metric named
> > > > > `pulsar_storage_earliest_msg_publish_time_in_backlog` in the
> > > topic-level
> > > > > that indicates the publish time of the earliest message in the
> > backlog.
> > > > > So users could get `pulsar_backlog_size_quota_used_percentage` by
> > > divide
> > > > > `pulsar_storage_backlog_size ` and
> > > > > `pulsar_storage_backlog_quota_limit`(`pulsar_storage_backlog_size`
> /
> > > > > `pulsar_storage_backlog_quota_limit`),
> > > > > and could get `pulsar_backlog_time_quota_used_percentage` by divide
> > > `now
> > > > -
> > > > > pulsar_storage_earliest_msg_publish_time_in_backlog` and
> > > > > `pulsar_storage_backlog_quota_limit_time` (`now -
> > > > > pulsar_storage_earliest_msg_publish_time_in_backlog` /
> > > > > `pulsar_storage_backlog_quota_limit_time`).
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think there is a problem with the name
> > > > `pulsar_storage_earliest_msg_publish_time_in_backlog` in the
> > topic-level:
> > > > * First, I prefer exposing the age rather than the publish time.
> > > > * Second, it's a bit hard to figure out the meaning of the earliest
> msg
> > > in
> > > > the backlog.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe `pulsar_storage_backlog_age_seconds`? In the explanation you
> can
> > > > write: "The age (time passed since it was published) of the earliest
> > > > unacknowledged message based on the topic's
> > > > existing subscriptions" ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The backlog quota time checker runs periodically, so we can cache
> its
> > > > > result, so it won't lead to much costs.
> > > > >
> > > > > Pulsar also exposed subscription-level  `backlogSize` and
> > > > > `earliestMsgPublishTimeInBacklog` in Pulsar-Admin
> > > > > <
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/pulsar-client-admin-api/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/client/admin/Topics.java#L1139
> > > > > >
> > > > > if
> > > > > `subscriptionBacklogSize` and `getEarliestTimeInBacklog` are true.
> > > > > We can also expose `backlogQuotaLimiteSize` and
> > `backlogQuotaLimitTime`
> > > > of
> > > > > the topic to PulsarAdmin.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > What is the relationship you see between Pulsar exposing
> > > > subscriptionBacklogSize and earliestMsgPublishTimeInBacklog in
> > > > subscription, to exposing the backlog quota limits in pulsar admin?
> > > >
> > > > Limits can be exposed to Pulsar Admin, since it has 0 cost associated
> > > with
> > > > it.
> > > > I think it's a good idea to do that.
> > > > The quota usage can also be exposed to pulsar admin, since we pull
> that
> > > > data from the backlog quota checker cache, so it has 0 cost as well.
> > > >
> > > > As we said in previous email we can also expose
> > > > `backlogQuotaTimeOldestBacklogAgeSubscriptionName`
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > After users receive the backlog alert from metrics alerting
> systems,
> > > they
> > > > > can get the topic name, then, they can request Topics#getStats
> > > > > <
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/pulsar-client-admin-api/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/client/admin/Topics.java#L1139
> > > > > >
> > > > > to
> > > > > get which subscriptions are in the huge backlog.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > I agree users can use PulsarAdmin getStats for topic , with
> > > > getEarliestTimeInBacklog=true to find the oldest subscription
> > responsible
> > > > for exceeding quota, but we can give them that information with 0
> cost
> > > > since we already have that subscription name cached (we spent the I/O
> > to
> > > > find out who that subscription is, let's just cache it and provide
> it).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Tao Jiuming
> > > > >
> > > > > Asaf Mesika <asaf.mes...@gmail.com> 于2023年3月1日周三 23:42写道:
> > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Pulsar has 2 configurations for the backlog eviction
> > > > > > > <
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/2.11.x/cookbooks-retention-expiry/#backlog-quotas
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > : backlogQuotaDefaultLimitBytes and
> > backlogQuotaDefaultLimitSecond.
> > > > > > > By default, backlog eviction is disabled, and also, there is a
> > > field
> > > > > > named
> > > > > > > backlogQuotaMap in TopicPolicies
> > > > > > > <
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/pulsar-common/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/common/policies/data/HierarchyTopicPolicies.java#L45
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > /NamespaceSpacePolicies
> > > > > > > <
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/pulsar-client-admin-api/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/common/policies/data/Policies.java#L41
> > > > > >
> > > > > > assists
> > > > > > > in controlling Topic/Namespace level backlog quota.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If topic backlog reaches the threshold of any item, backlog
> > > eviction
> > > > > will
> > > > > > > be triggered, Pulsar will move subscription's cursor to skip
> > > > > > unacknowledged
> > > > > > > messages.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Before backlog eviction happens, we don't have a metric to
> > monitor
> > > > how
> > > > > > > long that it can reaches the threshold.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I  think you should fix this explanation:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In Pulsar, a subscription maintains a state of message
> > acknowledged.
> > > A
> > > > > > subscription backlog is the set of messages which are
> > unacknowledged.
> > > > > > A subscription backlog size is the sum of size of unacknowledged
> > > > messages
> > > > > > (in bytes).
> > > > > > A topic can have many subscriptions.
> > > > > > A topic backlog is defined as the backlog size of the
> subscription
> > > > which
> > > > > > has the oldest unacknowledged message. Since acknowledged
> messages
> > > can
> > > > be
> > > > > > interleaved with unacknowledged messages, calculating the exact
> > size
> > > of
> > > > > > that subscription can be expensive as it requires I/O operations
> to
> > > > read
> > > > > > from the messages from the ledgers.
> > > > > > For that reason, the topic backlog is actually defined to be the
> > > > > estimated
> > > > > > backlog size of that subscription. It does so by summarizing the
> > size
> > > > of
> > > > > > all the ledgers, starting from the current active one, up to the
> > > ledger
> > > > > > which contains the oldest unacknowledged message (There is
> > actually a
> > > > > > faster way to calculate it, but this is the definition of the
> > > > > estimation).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A topic backlog age is the age of the oldest unacknowledged
> message
> > > (in
> > > > > any
> > > > > > subscription). If that message was written 30 minutes ago, its
> age
> > is
> > > > 30
> > > > > > minutes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Pulsar has a feature called backlog quota (place link). It allows
> > the
> > > > > user
> > > > > > to define a quota - in effect, a limit - which limits the topic
> > > > backlog.
> > > > > > There are two types of quotas:
> > > > > > * Size based: The limit is for the topic backlog size (as we
> > defined
> > > > > > above).
> > > > > > * Time based: The limit is for the topic's backlog age (as we
> > defined
> > > > > > above).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Once a topic backlog exceeds either one of those limits, an
> action
> > is
> > > > > taken
> > > > > > upon messages written to the topic:
> > > > > > * The producer write is placed on hold for a certain amount of
> time
> > > > > before
> > > > > > failing.
> > > > > > * The producer write is failed
> > > > > > * The subscriptions oldest unacknowledged messages will be
> > > acknowledged
> > > > > in
> > > > > > order until both the topic backlog size or age will fall inside
> the
> > > > limit
> > > > > > (quota). The process is called backlog eviction (happens every
> > > > interval)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The quotas can be defined as a default value for any topic, by
> > using
> > > > the
> > > > > > following broker configuration keys:
> backlogQuotaDefaultLimitBytes
> > ,
> > > > > > backlogQuotaDefaultLimitSecond. It can also be specified directly
> > for
> > > > all
> > > > > > topics in a given namespace using the namespace policy, or a
> > specific
> > > > > topic
> > > > > > using a topic policy.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The user today can calculate quota used for size based limit,
> since
> > > > there
> > > > > > are two metrics that are exposed today on a topic level: "
> > > > > > pulsar_storage_backlog_quota_limit" and
> > > "pulsar_storage_backlog_size".
> > > > > You
> > > > > > can just divide the two to get a percentage.
> > > > > > For the time-based limit, the only metric exposed today is quota
> > > itself
> > > > > , "
> > > > > > pulsar_storage_backlog_quota_limit_time".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would create two metrics:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > `pulsar_backlog_size_quota_used_percentage`
> > > > > > `pulsar_backlog_time_quota_used_percentage`
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You would like to know what triggered the alert, hence two.
> > > > > > It's not the quota percentage, it's the quota used percentage.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It checks if the backlog size exceeds the threshold(
> > > > > > > backlogQuotaDefaultLimitBytes), and it gets the current backlog
> > > size
> > > > by
> > > > > > > calculating LedgerInfo
> > > > > > > <
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/managed-ledger/src/main/proto/MLDataFormats.proto#L54
> > > > > > >,
> > > > > > > it will not lead to I/O.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is not correct.
> > > > > > It checks against the topic / namespace policy, and if it doesn't
> > > > exist,
> > > > > it
> > > > > > falls back on the default configuration key mentioned above.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It checks if the backlog time exceeds the threshold(
> > > > > > > backlogQuotaDefaultLimitSecond). If
> > > preciseTimeBasedBacklogQuotaCheck
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > set to be true, it will read an entry from Bookkeeper, but the
> > > > default
> > > > > > > value is false, which means it gets the backlog time by
> > calculating
> > > > > > > LedgerInfo
> > > > > > > <
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/managed-ledger/src/main/proto/MLDataFormats.proto#L54
> > > > > > >.
> > > > > > > So in general, we don't need to worry about it will lead to
> I/O.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm afraid of that.
> > > > > > Today the quota is checked periodically, right? So that's how the
> > > > > operator
> > > > > > knows the cost in terms of I/O is limited.
> > > > > >  Now you are adding one additional I/O per collection, every 1
> min
> > by
> > > > > > default. That's a lot perhaps. How long is the check interval
> > today?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Perhaps in the backlog quota check, you can persist the check
> > result,
> > > > and
> > > > > > use it? Persist the age that is.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regarding "slowest_subscription"
> > > > > > I think the cost is too high, because the subscriptions will keep
> > > > > > alternating, which can generate so many unique time series. Since
> > > > > > Prometheus flush only every 2 hours, or any there TSDB, it will
> > cost
> > > > you
> > > > > > too much.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I suggest exposing the name via the topic stats. This way they
> can
> > > > issue
> > > > > a
> > > > > > REST call to grab that subscription name only when the alert
> fires.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Asaf
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:29 AM 太上玄元道君 <dao...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Asaf,
> > > > > > > I've updated the PIP, PTAL
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thank,
> > > > > > > Tao Jiuming
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Asaf Mesika <asaf.mes...@gmail.com> 于2023年2月26日周日 23:03写道:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Pulsar has 2 configurations for the backlog eviction:
> > > > > > > > > backlogQuotaDefaultLimitBytes and
> > > backlogQuotaDefaultLimitSecond,
> > > > > if
> > > > > > > > > topic backlog reaches the threshold of any item, backlog
> > > eviction
> > > > > > will
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > triggered.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This seems like default values, not the actual values. Can
> you
> > > > please
> > > > > > > > provide an explanation in the PIP and link to read more:
> > > > > > > > 1. Where do you define the backlog quota exactly? What is the
> > > > > > granularity
> > > > > > > > (subscription?)
> > > > > > > > 2.  Is the backlog quota on by default? If so, what are the
> > > default
> > > > > > > values?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > *Notes*
> > > > > > > > 1. When the backlog quota limit is defined in Bytes, and you
> > wish
> > > > to
> > > > > > know
> > > > > > > > how close a subscription is to its bytes limit, you need to
> > > > calculate
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > backlog size in bytes. From my understanding, there is an
> > > accurate
> > > > > > > > calculation (which is costly in terms of I/O) and there is an
> > > > > estimate
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > it. I presume you would want to use the estimated one, is
> that
> > > > > correct?
> > > > > > > > The backlog quota itself, uses the accurate or the estimated
> > when
> > > > it
> > > > > > > starts
> > > > > > > > evicting entries (i.e. marking them as acknowledged)?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2. For the backlog limit specifying in time units, there is
> no
> > > > > > estimate,
> > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > it must be calculated all the time (earliest unacknowledged
> > > message
> > > > > > > > distance from now). How do you plan to calculate the current
> > age
> > > of
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > earliest message without bearing that I/O cost on each metric
> > > > > > > calculation?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 3. In the Goal section, you specify that your goal is to add
> a
> > > > > > > "proximity"
> > > > > > > > metric.
> > > > > > > > a) You must define that - what is proximity metric exactly?
> > What
> > > > are
> > > > > > its
> > > > > > > > units? How are you planning to calculate it?
> > > > > > > > b) Proximity is not a good term IMO. I personally have never
> > seen
> > > > > this
> > > > > > > term
> > > > > > > > used in software systems, unless it's in the aviation/space
> > > > industry.
> > > > > > > Once
> > > > > > > > you explain (a) I hope I can help provide alternative names.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 4. Maybe we should provide the used quota percentage for both
> > > > limits,
> > > > > > > > instead of one per both, since it's easier to act upon the
> > alert
> > > > when
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > need which one triggered it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 5. I didn't understand the "slowest_subscription" label used
> > when
> > > > > > > > describing the metric label. Can you please provide an
> > > explanation?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 6. I suggest writing a "High Level Design" section, and add
> > > > > everything
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > need to know for this proposal, so I don't need to read the
> > > > > > > > implementation details below (code).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Asaf
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 4:52 PM 太上玄元道君 <dao...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I've started a PIP to discuss: PIP-248 Add backlog eviction
> > > > metric
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ### Motivation:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Pulsar has 2 configurations for the backlog eviction:
> > > > > > > > > `backlogQuotaDefaultLimitBytes` and
> > > > > `backlogQuotaDefaultLimitSecond`,
> > > > > > > if
> > > > > > > > > topic backlog reaches the threshold of any item, backlog
> > > eviction
> > > > > > will
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > triggered.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Before backlog eviction happens, we don't have a metric to
> > > > monitor
> > > > > > how
> > > > > > > > long
> > > > > > > > > that it can reaches the threshold.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > We can provide a progress bar metric to tell users some
> > topics
> > > is
> > > > > > about
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > trigger backlog eviction. And users can subscribe the alert
> > to
> > > > > > schedule
> > > > > > > > > consumers.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > For more details, please read the PIP at
> > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19601
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > Tao Jiuming
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to