This is a good initiative. > (1) GitHub.com/apache/pulsar-client-ruby/ - There is only an initial commit > of a README. I think that it should be deleted.
That has two PRs. That makes me think we should move the repo to read only, instead. > (2) GitHub.com/apache/pulsar-connectors/ - This was abandoned in Nov 2020. We > should make it read only. > (3) GitHub.com/apache/pulsar-presto/ - This was also abandoned in Nov 2020. > We should make it read only. We need to understand the status of PIP 62 in order to know what to do for these repos. See https://lists.apache.org/thread/gj8ctgx91xhysc46pfgdqy7bncymv3vn Moving the presto integration has been discussed several times before, but we still have it in the apache/pulsar repo. Thanks, Michael On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 3:04 PM Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi - > > > > We have several unmaintained or abandoned repositories. We should retire > > these by either marking them read-only after leaving a README or we should > > delete them. > > > > (1) GitHub.com/apache/pulsar-client-ruby/ - There is only an initial commit > > of a README. I think that it should be deleted. > > > > (2) GitHub.com/apache/pulsar-connectors/ - This was abandoned in Nov 2020. > > We should make it read only. > > > > (3) GitHub.com/apache/pulsar-presto/ - This was also abandoned in Nov 2020. > > We should make it read only. > > (4) GitHub.com/apache/pulsar-release/ - This was also abandoned in Nov 2020. > We should make it read only. > > > > > Best, > > Dave >
