+100
Also note that for good or bad reasons, the number of questions on
StaOverflow is often used as a metric for the popularity of a project.

Le mer. 15 févr. 2023 à 13:12, Kiryl Valkovich <kiryl_valkovich@teal.tools>
a écrit :

> Hi everyone! Enrico Olivelli asked me to repost it to the mailing list.
>
> --- Me
> I’m very worried that good answers from David Kjerrumgaard and others
> won’t be googleable because it’s in Slack. To make any search you need to
> pay a monthly subscription.
>
> In my opinion, it would be wiser to make StackOverflow, Discuss, or GitHub
> discussions a place for questions. And strictly redirect people who ask any
> question in Slack to the right place.
> In GitHub discussions, you also can manage categories, as well as you can
> manage channels in Slack.
>
> Subscription to a specific category is coming soon.
> https://github.com/community/community/discussions/3951#discussioncomment-3879939
> The most important that it’s searchable.
>
> Examples:
> https://github.com/community/community/discussions
> https://github.com/apache/superset/discussions
>
> --- Later me to David Kjerrumgaard
> What do you think about the following workflow:
> 1. The user asks a new question in Slack.
> 2. You click the three dots button on his message -> “Convert to a GitHub
> discussion”.
> 3. The bot creates a new GitHub discussion in the “Q&A” category with the
> original message’s content.
> 4. The bot converts the original message to a thread and posts a message
> like:
> > In order to keep history and make your question searchable by other
> Apache Pulsar users, it has been converted to a GitHub discussion.
> > Further conversation is available by this link:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/discussions/18766.
> 5. You answer the question on GitHub.
>
> How it may work:
> https://api.slack.com/best-practices/blueprints/actions-and-dialogs
> I can try to implement it makes any sense for you. (edited)
>
> Full original thread:
> https://apache-pulsar.slack.com/archives/C5Z4T36F7/p1676449603034309
>
>

Reply via email to