Thanks to everyone for providing their input. Please vote on the VOTE thread https://lists.apache.org/thread/ykfnfb1pv4bcxwr6lwb4klc3byq71t13
Many thanks, Alexander On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 5:01 AM r...@apache.org <ranxiaolong...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Alexander, thanks your work for this. > It seems that all agrees with this PIP, maybe we can enter the VOTE thread > to initiate a VOTE process for this PIP. > > -- > Thanks > Xiaolong Ran > > r...@apache.org <ranxiaolong...@gmail.com> 于2023年1月19日周四 11:57写道： > > > +1 > > > > We can imitate the PulsarClient object, and in the BaseContext interface, > > add PulsarAdmin and PulsarAdminBuilder as interfaces at the same time. > > > > -- > > Thanks > > Xiaolong Ran > > > > Neng Lu <nl...@apache.org> 于2023年1月19日周四 02:28写道： > > > >> The proposal makes sense to me. > >> > >> The only note I want to add is to make sure the PulsarAdmin access in > >> Source and Sink is also controlled by the flag > >> `exposePulsarAdminClientEnabled`. Similar to the following: > >> > >> > >> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/pulsar-functions/runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/functions/runtime/thread/ThreadRuntimeFactory.java#L111 > >> > >> On 2023/01/03 14:31:52 Alexander Preuss wrote: > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > I opened a PIP to discuss making PulsarAdmin accessible in Pulsar IO > >> > connectors through SinkContext and SourceContext: > >> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19123 > >> > > >> > Looking forward to hearing your thoughts, > >> > Alex > >> > > >> > > >
