Can the scenarios of breaking changes for users be described in the PIP if
they exist? If this is a breaking change, it might be a good thing to point
it out in the PIP and in the release notes ("If you did this, then perhaps
you want to do that").Context question since I'm not familiar with functions: How does a function author use Jackson provided by Pulsar? Why does pulsar provide Jackson to function? On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 12:12 PM Lari Hotari <lhot...@apache.org> wrote: > I created PIP-243, https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19243 . Since > this is already discussed in this thread, I'll open it directly for voting. > > -Lari > > On 2023/01/09 11:05:35 Lari Hotari wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Jackson has a separate Java 8 support modules for adding support for > proper serialization and deserialization of new classes that were added in > Java 8 (Java 8 was released in 2014). > > > > These Jackson Java 8 support modules haven't been used in the Pulsar > code base. This is a pity. This causes a lot of pain when using Java Time > classes in Pulsar applications or Pulsar Functions. There are ways to get > the classes working for applications, but the documentation is missing. It > would make things easier if the Java 8 support modules for Jackson would be > included and registered by default. > > > > I have created a PR to register Jackson Java 8 support modules by > default for all Pulsar components. The PR is > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/19161 . > > > > Please review and provide feedback. Do we need a PIP for this change? > > > > -Lari > > >
