Il Sab 31 Dic 2022, 08:09 Haiting Jiang <jianghait...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> > Should we allow the user to create the non-partitioned topic name like > `persistent://tenant/namespace/localname-partition-0`? > I don't think this is currently possible. And if it is possible I am 100% that that topic won't work. Did you try? Enrico > +1, I support this to be the default behavior. > But we need to consider the compatibility issue, so maybe the check > should happen on the server side and it can be turned off with a flag. > > Thanks, > Haiting > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 1:33 PM <mattisonc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, All > > > > I have another question that needs to discuss. > > > > Should we allow the user to create the non-partitioned topic name like > `persistent://tenant/namespace/localname-partition-0`? > > > > If so, this is a little confusing with the partitioned topic. > > > > e.g.: > > TopicName#isPartitioned method. > > > > Best, > > Mattison > > On Dec 28, 2022, 12:43 +0800, mattisonc...@gmail.com, wrote: > > > Hi, All > > > > > > I'd like to start a discussion of this behaviour change as follow. > > > > > > The issue is described here: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19085 > > > And the fix PR here: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/19086 > > > > > > --- > > > > > > Behaviour change: > > > > > > Before: we can create non-existent persistent partitions. > > > > > > After: we will get `PulsarClientException.TopicDoesNotExistException` > when we create non-existent persistent partitions. > > > > > > Please feel free to leave comments if you have any concerns. > > > > > > Best, > > > Mattison >
