I submitted a PR for this here: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/18974


On 1 Sep 2022 at 17:07:29, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Asaf,
> good question!
>
> Il giorno gio 1 set 2022 alle ore 15:01 Asaf Mesika
> <asaf.mes...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm fairly new to this project and I have seen 2 options to comment to a
>
> PIP:
>
> 1. In the GitHub issue.
>
> 2. In the mailing list.
>
>
> I was wondering what is the best practice.
>
>
>
> In Apache projects we generally prefer discussions on the mailing
> list, because it is easier to let the community
> participate in the discussions.
>
> Unfortunately in order to follow a discussion on GH you must actively
> follow the notifications (hundreds of messages per day)
> or use any other means to stay up to date.
>
> So we generally keep "discussions" here.
>
> When you go down to implementation details it is better to work on the
> PR, as it is more productive.
> But for high level discussion it is better that they happen here
>
> Discussing on the GH issue of the PIP is misleading, and I agree with
> you that we should keep the discussions only in one place
>
> Enrico
>
>
> I know there is an ongoing initiative at the moment to switch a PIP to
>
> become a file and actually a PR for submitting it. I guess the question
>
> also applies to this new scheme :)
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Asaf
>
>

Reply via email to