Michael has brought this up before. Thanks for taking action!

+1

Also I think we need to think about docs for versions including master the same 
way,

Best,
Dave

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 25, 2022, at 1:08 AM, tison <wander4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm working on the API docs generator tools and noticed that we're
> inconsistently releasing API docs for Python client, C++ client, Java
> client, admin and functions.
> 
> Basically, we release API docs _sometimes_ for minor release (patch version
> bump), and display API docs with -SNAPSHOT suffix for javadocs and C++
> client API doc.
> 
> I finished the tools to generate API docs upon a specific X.Y.Z version and
> remove all SNAPSHOT docs for C++ client API docs.
> 
> Although, with a few offline discussion with RMs (@Yunze, @Haiting), I
> realize that as long as patch versions don't change public API, the API
> docs should be the same among the same series of major version (e.g.,
> 2.8.x, 3.0.x).
> 
> Thus, I propose to release API docs only for major release (a.k.a, minor
> version bump).
> 
> I'm going to:
> 
> 1. Adjust the tools[1] to accept X.Y.Z version and produce API docs for X.Y;
> 2. Adjust references in the doc site to X.Y API docs (current to X.Y.Z or
> -SNAPSHOT);
> 3. Update the release process to explicitly document RM's responsibility
> and how-tos.
> 
> All these changes are supposed to be applied for maintained versions: >=
> 2.8. Existing links except -SNAPSHOT ones will be kept.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Best,
> tison.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site/blob/main/tools/pytools/README.md

Reply via email to