GitHub user michaeljmarshall added a comment to the discussion: why "egatively acknowledged before the acknowledgment timeout"?? after Can't?
> If you are going to use negative acknowledgment on a message, make sure it is > negatively acknowledged before the acknowledgment timeout. I am pretty sure you _can_ negatively acknowledge a message after the ack timeout has triggered an internal negative acknowledgement. Are you seeing something otherwise? The documentation is just trying to say that you might negatively acknowledge the message twice in that scenario, but if you nack the message before its timeout, it will only be nack'ed once. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/discussions/18248#discussioncomment-3993673 ---- This is an automatically sent email for dev@pulsar.apache.org. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: dev-unsubscr...@pulsar.apache.org
