According to the lazy consensus rule, I opened this tracking issue and start working on it: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/18144
I expect to deliver the result by the next week. Best, tison. Yu <li...@apache.org> 于2022年10月17日周一 15:59写道： > Hi tison, > > Thanks for taking care of the docs! > Seems that archiving the incubating docs does not affect the existing > workflow of Pulsar doc update/maintenance. > +1 for this proposal. > > Yu > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 3:24 PM tison <wander4...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > I noticed that we write a lot of logic to handle ancient documents back > to > > the incubating period on the current doc site syncing and building. It > > causes unnecessary maintenance burdens as well as more broken links due > to > > different document frameworks. > > > > Since those ancient documents have lower visits and most importantly, we > > should not make any changes to them, I propose: > > > > 1. Redirect https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/xxx-incubating/ to > > https://pulsar.staged.apache.org/docs/xxx-incubating > > 2. Remove > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/tree/master/site2/website/versioned_docs/xxx-incubating > > . > > 3. Remove build logic about those pages. > > > > What do you think? > > > > Best, > > tison. > > >
