Given the past experiences and the discussions that already happened around "PIP-175: Extend time based release process", the idea is to detach the 3.0 from "big-features" items or "incompatible changes".
The changes are going to get included as they are ready, within feature releases, and in a fully compatible way. We don't need to group them together and create unnecessary risk for the release schedule and the users. -- Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com> On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 10:47 AM Lari Hotari <lhot...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Greeting from ApacheCon North America 2022 from New Orleans! > We had a great conference with a dedicated Pulsar track. Thanks to all > presenters and everyone who attended. The talks weren't recorded, but the > slides will be later on posted on the conference website [1]. > > At ApacheCon there were several presentations about "the Apache way" and what > that means in practice. Based on that, we all know that no person is > nominated as the CTO of Apache Pulsar who decides on Pulsar 3.0 and when that > happens. It's us, the community, that serve that role together. We come > together as individuals with the Apache hat on. Everyone is equal in the > community, regardless of whether they are contributors, committers or PMC > members. > We welcome everyone to participate. The small detail about voting shouldn't > stop anyone from participating in any aspects of the planning for the roadmap. > > I'll like to get the discussions going for Pulsar 3.0. We don't need a > separate decision to start planning that. Please correct me if I'm wrong or > if you have a different opinion. > > There are a few previous discussion threads that are related to Pulsar 3.0 > planning. > If you are interested in getting involved with Apache Pulsar 3.0 planning, I > think that it makes sense for you to read these threads carefully and reply > to them. Please also suggest what you think makes sense. > > PIP-45 related: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/tvco1orf0hsyt59pjtfbwoq0vf6hfrcj > Pulsar Load balancer / namespace bundle related: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/roohoc9h2gthvmd7t81do4hfjs2gphpk > renaming topics: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/vrr75rrh4trqlp14objh3snlfvmzdrp2 > backpressure: https://lists.apache.org/thread/v7xy57qfzbhopoqbm75s6ng8xlhbr2q6 > > Long list of Metadata inconsistency issues by Zac Bentley: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12555 > That would be a good starting point to understanding the data inconsistency > issues related to current PIP-45 design. Perhaps those could be addressed > already before Pulsar 3.0? > > I'm looking forward to everyone's participation in the Apache Pulsar 3.0 > planning discussions. > > Best Regards, > > -Lari > > 1 - https://www.apachecon.com/acna2022/schedule.html
