+1(non-binding)Baodi ShiThanks2022年9月27日上午2:56,Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org>
写道:https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/17724## MotivationPulsar C++ code base is in the same
main repository for the Pulsar project.While the decision was the right one at the time, there is
aconsiderable overheadin keeping the C++ client in its current position.### Issues with the current
approachThe Pulsar repository has grown a lot in size and number of active developers.1. The
frequency of changes in various parts of the codebase hasincreased to a point where the amount of
resources dedicated to CI isvery significant. Every change in Java code will trigger the CI jobs for
the C++client and every change in the C++ client will do the same. During a CI job we are building
the C++ client multiple times: 1. For C++ and Python client tests 2. To build Python wheels to be
included in the pulsar Dockerimages (for supporting Pulsar functions)2. The release process for
Pulsar has become very complex andrequires building a large number of binaries for C++ and Python
clients. This hasbecome too much of a burden during the course of a Pulsar release.## GoalDecouple
the development of C++ and Python client libraries from thedevelopment of the core components of
Pulsar in Java.## Changes### Repositories1. Move the C++ client code to a new
repository`github.com/apache/pulsar-client-c++`2. Move the Python client code to a new
repository`github.com/apache/pulsar-client-python`The change will be done without losing any
history, extracting asub-directory into a new Git repository.```git filter-repo
--subdirectory-filter pulsar-client-cpp```### Release processThe release process will be split in
multiple parts:1. the main Pulsar release will only contain the Java parts (serverdistribution and
Java client library)2. The C++ client will have its own release schedule and versioning3. The Python
client will have its own release schedule and versioning#### VersioningBoth C++ and Python clients
will continue with their own individual versioning.In order to not break anything or cause more
confusion, we would needto use a new version that is bigger than the current version (2.11.x).The
suggestion is to start the new releases for both C++ and Python from 3.0.0.#### Existing
branchesExisting branches of Pulsar, where the C++ client will still be in thesame main the
repository and will be receiving bug fixes in theircurrent location.The different location of the
new C++ code will make thecherry-picking process slightly more painful in the short term, thoughit
will even out in long term.### Projects dependencies#### C++/Python --> PulsarBoth C++ and Python
unit/integration tests are designed to run againsta standalone instance of Pulsar broker. In the
current form, they'reusing the `master` code that is built to run the tests.After the split, the
unit tests will use a Docker image of Pulsar. Wecan use a few different images to test for
compatibility1. Latest stable (eg: 2.10.1)2. Nightly (Pulsar Docker image published every day from
master branch)#### Pulsar --> PythonTo create a Pulsar image, we are now building the Python
client wheelfile and then installing it at build time.Instead, we are going to include a wheel file
for a version of thePython client that has been already released.#### Python --> C++The Python
client library is just a wrapper on top of the C++ client.Today these are built together, with
Python wrapper code residing in asub-directory of C++ client code, and compiled using the same
CMakebuild script.By separating the Python client into a different repository, we aregoing to depend
on an already released version of the C++ client.#### Automated documentation in the websiteOn the
Pulsar website we are auto-generating C++ documentation withthe Doxygen tool and the Python one with
Pdoc.Instead of just fetching the main repo code, the website build jobshould be also fetching the
new repos to run the tooling.--Matteo Merli<mme...@apache.org>