+1.

> Before creating a proposal, we should have a discussion first on the
mailing list, just get feedback on the motivation.

I think it's a good idea to separate the motivation and formal proposal for
complicated PIPs.
So that we can avoid spending too much effort if the community is not
interested in the PIP.


> If there are no objections, the proposal owner can add a line to the file
with the PIP number through a...

It's better to set a clear rule or a specific time limit for this
non-objection step in the new PIP guidelines for beginners.


Thanks,
Haiting

On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 6:07 PM PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org> wrote:

> Bump
>
> Penghui
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 11:27 PM PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Currently, the new proposal will be added to the issue list and then
> > shared link in the email
> > to request the proposal review. It's really hard to review a long
> proposal
> > if you want to comment
> > in detail.
> >
> > Here is an example:
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16763#issuecomment-1219606491
> > This seems very unintuitive.
> >
> > I think we can move all the PIPs to the codebase and the new proposal and
> > proposal without
> > any reviews should happen with a PR first. So that we can review and
> > comment easily.
> > Certainly, all the votes should happen on the mailing list. And we can
> > also discuss the
> > proposal on the mailing list.
> >
> > Following this way, we don't need to sync the PIPs from the issue to the
> > wiki page.
> > We can just add a link that points to the PIPs dir to the contribution
> > guide or README.
> >
> > We have another pain point about the duplicated PIP number. We can
> > maintain a file, a list of
> > all the proposal contains the approved, in-review, drafting. Before
> > creating a proposal, we should
> > have a discussion first on the mailing list, just get feedback on the
> > motivation. If there are no objections,
> > the proposal owner can add a line to the file with the PIP number through
> > a PR, like PIP-123: xxx (Under Discussion).
> > So that we can prevent the duplicated PIP number(which will conflict if
> > someone merged first).
> > After the PR is merged, we can send out a new PR to add the proposal.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Penghui
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to