Hi Anonymitaet, On 1, Starlight for JMS is technically a wrapper around the Java API. However, JMS is a widely used client API specification so to call it a client wrapper doesn't seem like the right classification to me. The Python client is a wrapper around the C client, but we don't call that a client wrapper, is called the Python client.
On 2, I agree it makes sense to call it a "Security Plugin". Thanks, Chris On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 at 01:06, Yu <li...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > Thank you very much for providing useful information! I've added them all > to the sheet. > > For categories, I have two quick questions: > > #1. For Starlight for JMS [1] > I see you categorize it as "Client API". Does it make sense to categorize > it as "Client Wrapper"? (which is the same as the Kafka Client Wrapper [2]) > > #2. For OpenID Connect Authentication Plugin [3] > I see you categorize it as "Authentication Plugin". Does it make sense to > categorize it as "Security Plugin"? It is more general and "extendable" > since we can include more security-related plugins (eg. > authentication/authorization plugins) in the future. > > Let me know what you think, thanks! > > [1] https://github.com/datastax/pulsar-jms > [2] > https://github.com/apache/pulsar-adapters/tree/master/pulsar-client-kafka-compat > [3] https://github.com/datastax/pulsar-openid-connect-plugin > > Anonymitaet > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 2:08 AM Chris Bartholomew < > chris.bartholo...@kesque.com> wrote: > >> Hi Anonymitaet, >> >> I provided input on the "Components Managed by DataStax" as a comment >> in the Google doc. If you need any more information, please let me know. >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> >> >> On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 at 06:36, Yu <li...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi Pulsarers, >>> >>> >>> For the Ecosystem Page [1], we want to make it a place for the Pulsar >>> community to come together and share the components the community needs to >>> build better streaming data pipelines and event-driven applications. >>> >>> >>> So I've collected all Pulsar-related plugins and tried to re-categorize >>> them **based on scenarios**. >>> >>> >>> For the "Components Managed by DataStax", does anyone can help review >>> the "Category"? [2] We're unsure about it. >>> >>> >>> Feel free to review the whole sheet and comment if I miss or >>> misunderstand anything, thank you! >>> >>> >>> [1] https://pulsar-next.staged.apache.org/ecosystem/ >>> >>> [2] >>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n4oAQx_hxBaEYkHiVVRVTVpOKfE26i4am6UYieriXYQ/edit#gid=0 >>> >>> >>> Anonymitaet >>> >>> >>>
