Are we keeping all of the git history in that transition? If we plan on dropping history, is that something we can do now?
Thanks, Michael On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 11:19 AM Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org> wrote: > > Before the asf-site branch can deleted the people working on the website need > to finish the transition of https://github.com/apache/pulsar-site to build > the main site and not a staging site. > > All the best, > Dave > > > On Feb 15, 2022, at 8:55 AM, Michael Marshall <mmarsh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Now that https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/14226 is merged, our > > current release branches are correctly protected from force pushes. > > > > Importantly, the `asf-site` branch is no longer protected. That branch > > is responsible for quite a bit of data in our git repo. Anecdotally, > > when I tried to clone the apache/pulsar repo yesterday, it took 10 > > minutes to clone about 40% of the repo. It'd be great to reduce the > > overall size of our git repo. What is the status of the plan to move > > that branch or remove some or all of its history? > > > > Thanks, > > Michael > > > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 6:00 PM Michael Marshall <mmarsh...@apache.org> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> Our current apache/pulsar GitHub repo does not have protections on our > >> current release branches. I think we should protect against deletion > >> and force pushes, at a minimum. > >> > >> Here is my PR to update the .asf.yaml to comply with these rules: > >> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/14226. There is more detail in > >> the PR. Please review, if you're interested. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Michael >
