Hi enrico, There are some other ongoing transaction fixes, we can't wait for all of them to be completed Please move them to 2.9.3 and don't block the 2.9.2 release.
And https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/14097 also in the discussion stage, We should keep calm at this time, no need to hurry to merge a 100% clear plan, otherwise, we might introduce other regression in 2.9.2. Another point is non-transaction users are much larger than transaction users for now, there are many critical issue fixes in 2.9.2, I see many users can't wait for our release, they build from the branch-2.9 manually. We should follow the time-based release mode. If the release doesn't have critical security issues, regressions. we should not block the release, instead, we should prepare for the release of 2.9.3 earlier. If the time-based release doesn't work, I think we should have a discussion in the private email list to find a good solution for Pulsar release, Let everyone keep consistent on the rules for release. Regards, Penghui On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 5:04 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > Penghui, Gao, > see my comments below please > > Il giorno mar 8 feb 2022 alle ore 09:16 Hang Chen > <chenh...@apache.org> ha scritto: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Verified the following context. > > 1. Checked the checksum and licenses > > 2. Build from the source code successfully > > 3. Start standalone and run pulsar-perf with produce and consume > > 4. Checked the Pulsar function and stateful functions > > 5. Run Pulsar with KOP and publish and consume successfully with Kafka > > 3.1.0 client > > > > Best, > > Hang > > > > PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org> 于2022年2月7日周一 18:01写道： > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > 1. Checked the signature > > > 2. Build from the source successfully > > > 3. Start standalone > > > 4. Publish and consume successfully > > > 5. Cassandra connect works well > > > 6. Checked state function > > > > > > And passed our internal integration tests. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Penghui > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 4:37 PM PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > It's not a regression in 2.9.2, we should not block the 2.9.2 > release. > > > > Instead, we can have the fix in 2.9.3. > > It depends on the timeline of 2.9.3...but we cannot "promise" we will > follow up immediately with another release. > > My understanding is that now if you enable transactions then you > cannot use regular Pulsar producers. > And from 2.9 we said that Transactions are no more BETA > > This is very bad from my point of view. > > I agree that this is not a regression of 2.9.2 vs 2.9.1, but basically > the Transactions feature is not usable > > There is already a PR open, with a good discussion. > I believe that we should not hurry up in doing this release and we can > fix the problem. > > We should fix the problem and then roll a new RC > > If my understanding is correct, then I am -1 in releasing this RC. > If it is not correct, then I am happy to continue testing this RC. > > Enrico > > > > > > > > > > > > Penghui > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 8:42 PM Nicolò Boschi <boschi1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi Ran, thanks for driving the release. > > > >> > > > >> I haven't tested the rc yet but I firmly believe we should include > this > > > >> pull [1] which fixes a regression introduced in Pulsar 2.9.0 > > > >> > > > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/14097 > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Il giorno mer 2 feb 2022 alle ore 08:34 Enrico Olivelli < > > > >> eolive...@gmail.com> > > > >> ha scritto: > > > >> > > > >> > (sorry for the late reply, I am still testing, I had some other > > > >> > priorities). > > > >> > > > > >> > I hope that the community will test this RC and report back > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > Enrico > > > >> > > > > >> > Il giorno mar 25 gen 2022 alle ore 15:07 Ran Gao <r...@apache.org> > ha > > > >> > scritto: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Sorry, the 2.9.2 release candidate-1 has a wrong sign > certificate. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > This is the second release candidate for Apache Pulsar, version > 2.9.2. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > *** Please download, test, and vote on this release. This vote > will > > > >> stay > > > >> > > open > > > >> > > for at least 72 hours *** > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are > provided > > > >> for > > > >> > > convenience. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Source and binary files: > > > >> > > > > > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pulsar/pulsar-2.9.2-candidate-2/ > > > >> > > > > > >> > > SHA-512 checksums: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > 563f65582c5307b4ef1e0322958ed19d7c181fb8bb8d7b8cab06ab0a6adb5520f7d18b6f97960b93c3318815529a8b8721e00e9cc9484532a2e5ed3221450094 > > > >> > > ./apache-pulsar-2.9.2-bin.tar.gz > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > 60d1049611b938b0ddc769132124d43820728afc8a06813a5ec9efc095c5497c59d9bbcaaf7df5b0c0e97e051d66f59c1f8ee08885d05ca2c635773e0283770a > > > >> > > ./apache-pulsar-2.9.2-src.tar.gz > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Maven staging repo: > > > >> > > > > > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepulsar-1136 > > > >> > > > > > >> > > The tag to be voted upon: > > > >> > > v2.9.2-candidate-2 (8a5d2253b888b3b865a2aedf635d6727777821c7) > > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/releases/tag/v2.9.2-candidate-2 > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Pulsar's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the > release: > > > >> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pulsar/KEYS > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Please download the source package, and follow the README to > build > > > >> > > and run the Pulsar standalone service. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> Nicolò Boschi > > > >> > > > > >
