Hi Pulsar Community,

This is the voting thread for PIP-124. It will stay open for at least
48 hours. Pasted below for quoting convenience.

Here is the issue for this PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13408

----

## Motivation

If we enable the DLQ when consuming messages. For some messages that
can't be processed successfully, the messages will be moved to the
DLQ, but if we do not specify the data retention for the namespace or
create a subscription for the DLQ to retain the data, the data of the
DLQ will be removed automatically. Therefore, we need to create the
initial subscription before sending messages to the DLQ.

## Goal

Users can set the initial subscription name in the DeadLetterPolicy.
The consumer will create the initial subscription before sending
messages to the DLQ. At this point, subsequent messages produced to
the DLQ are not automatically deleted unexpectedly. If
`allowAutoSubscriptionCreation` in `broker.conf` is false, the initial
subscription won't be created automatically. Otherwise, it will
confuse the user. Users can explicitly create that subscription to
handle this case.

This PIP needs to be compatible with the previous behavior. The
initial subscription name in the DeadLetterPolicy is optional. The
default behavior is not to create the initial subscription which is
consistent with the original behavior.

## API Changes

* Add `initSubscriptionName` to the `DeadLetterPolicy`

```java
/**
 * Name of the initial subscription name of the dead letter topic.
 * If this field is not set, the initial subscription will not be created.
 */
private String initSubscriptionName;
```

* Add a new field to the `CommandProducer`. The broker will use this
field to create the initial subscription.

```proto
optional string initial_subscription_name
```

* Add a new config to the Producer Configuration. This allows the
consumer to specify the initial subscription when creating the
deadLetterProducer.

```java
/**
 * Use this config to automatically create an initial subscription
when creating the topic.
 * If this field is not set, the initial subscription will not be created.
 *
 * @param initialSubscriptionName
 *              Name of the initial subscription of the topic.
 * @return the producer builder instance
 */
ProducerBuilder<T> initialSubscriptionName(String initialSubscriptionName);
```


## Implementation

When the deadLetterProducer is initialized, the consumer will set the
initial subscription of the deadLetterProducer according to the
DeadLetterPolicy.

When the broker creates a producer(after receiving the
CommandProducer), if it finds that the topic does not exist, it will
not only create the topic(if the topic automatically creation is
enabled) but also create the initial subscription(if the initial
subscription name is set). When creating an initial subscription, the
user needs to have the `canConsume` permission and the
`allowAutoSubscriptionCreation` needs to be enabled.

## Reject Alternatives

### Create the initial subscription using the consumer

Before the deadLetterProducer is initialized, the consumer first tries
to create a deadLetterConsumer using the initial subscription name in
the DeadLetterPolicy. When this subscription already exists, the
ConsumerBusy exception will occur. In this case, we can ignore that
exception and create the deadLetterProducer.

This is the original solution for this PIP. But this introduces too
much workload for the client. In the subsequent discussion, we try to
add a new command `CommandCreateSubscription` to avoid creating and
closing the deadLetterConsumer, but again, this introduces workload as
well as greater complexity.

### Use the retention policy to retent the data of the DLQ

Before creating the deadLetterProducer,  an admin can create a
retention policy for the topic or namespace. Then, consumers of the
topic have the duration of the retention policy to discover the topic
and create a subscription before messages are lost.

But users are not easy to set a different data retention policy or
create a new subscription for a lazy created DLQ topic.

### Add a new policy to retain data when the topic has no subscriptions

Adding a new policy for pulsar topics: a namespace or a topic level
policy that makes it possible to retain messages indefinitely when a
topic has no subscriptions.

For the auto-created topic, the subscription can only be determined at
the time of creation. It may or may not create. If users are able to
determine which consumers are, and these consumers need to receive any
message sent by the producer, they should create the topic and
subscription manually or use the consumer to trigger the topic
auto-creation, not the producer.

### Add the initial subscription name field to the metadata of the
CommandProducer

Use producer metadata to carry the init subscription name so that we
don't need to introduce a new field in CommandProducer, and the new
field looks a little confusing.

While this does not change protobuf, it still implicitly changes the
protocol. This solution has different advantages and disadvantages
than the current one. Finally, we decided to go with the current
solution.

In addition, there is a discussion about whether we need to create the
initial subscription on the retryLetterTopic. The consumer has already
subscribed to the retryLetterTopic and created the subscription before
creating the retryLetterProducer, so we don't need to create the
initial subscription for it.



Prototype implementation PR: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/13355

----

Thanks
Zike Yang

Reply via email to