+1, Great feature. > It is not a goal to implement a Pulsar backed Database system
But this does look like a database system. I believe there would be some limitations here, either in availability, consistency, performance, storage cost, etc. So I think we can provide more information about disadvantages to guide user's choice. On 2021/12/24 09:53:37 Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hello everyone, > I want to start a discussion about PIP-124 Pulsar Client Shared State API > > This is the PIP document > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13490 > > This is a demo implementation (a proof-of-concept): > https://github.com/eolivelli/pulsar-shared-state-manager > > Please take a look and share your thoughts > > I believe that this will unlock the potential of the Exclusive > Producer and it will also make easier the life of many developers who > are using Pulsar and need some API to share configuration, metadata, > or any simple key-value data structure without adding a Database or > other components to their library, Pulsar IO connector or Pulsar > Protocol Handler. > > Thanks > Enrico >
