+1

- Michael

On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 6:10 AM Hang Chen <chenh...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Hang
>
> PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org> 于2021年12月22日周三 19:28写道:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Penghui
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 6:57 PM ZhangJian He <shoot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Christophe Bornet <bornet.ch...@gmail.com> 于2021年12月22日周三 17:38写道:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Le mer. 22 déc. 2021 à 00:46, Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org> a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > > This is the voting thread for PIP-120. It will stay open for at least
> > > > 48h.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13306
> > > > >
> > > > > --------
> > > > >
> > > > > ## Motivation
> > > > >
> > > > > In Pulsar 2.8, we have introduced a setting to control the amount of
> > > > memory
> > > > > used by a client instance.
> > > > >
> > > > > ```java
> > > > > interface ClientBuilder {
> > > > >     ClientBuilder memoryLimit(long memoryLimit, SizeUnit unit);
> > > > > }
> > > > > ```
> > > > >
> > > > > By default, in 2.8 and 2.9 this setting is set to 0, meaning no limit
> > > is
> > > > > being
> > > > > enforced.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it's a good time for 2.10 to enable this setting by default
> > > and,
> > > > > correspondingly, to disable by default the producer queue size limit.
> > > > >
> > > > > This will simplify a lot the configuration that a producer application
> > > > will
> > > > > have to come up with, when publishing with many topic/partitions or
> > > > > when messages
> > > > > are bigger than expected.
> > > > >
> > > > > ## Proposed changes
> > > > >
> > > > > In 2.10 release, for the `ClientBuilder`, change
> > > > >   * `memoryLimit`: 0 -> 64 MB
> > > > >
> > > > > For the `ProducerBuilder`, changes
> > > > >   * `maxPendingMessages`: 1000 -> 0
> > > > >
> > > > > 64MB is picked because it's a small enough memory size that will
> > > > guarantee
> > > > > a very high producer throughput, irrespective of the individual
> > > messages
> > > > > size.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matteo Merli
> > > > > <mme...@apache.org>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >

Reply via email to