Hello, I believe that we should not cherry-pick changes to released branches (branch-2.x) if there is no strong reason to do it.
I think that the only types of fixes that are eligible for cherry-picks are: - security issues - fixes for regressions - fixes for serious bugs (but the change is not likely to break other things or it does not need dependencies) Pulsar is widely used and any patch you add may make the branch unstable. New features or improvements should go only to the "master" branch. We do not cut releases very often, and it is better to have stable branches. We do not have strong quality assurance systems against the branches that are not the "master" branch, so it is very hard to say that a released branch is stable. Thoughts ? Enrico
