I'm a bit hesitant about this because I think there are already at least 3 different ways to handle similar scenarios.
1. Using listener and avoid calling receive directly 2. Use multi-topic consumer, so there's a single `Consumer` instance exposed 3. Use `consumer.receive(0, TimeUnit.SECONDS)` to probe for message -- Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 7:34 PM ZhangJian He <shoot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think it's better to add the method to Consumer interface instead of let > user casting it to `ConsumerBase`. > `peek` is most complexly, for the reason, I can use the `peek` object to > ack、negative ack, but when to remove from the `BlockingQueue`? > IMHO, people use this api are just to judge if has the message, otherwise, > they can just use `receive(0,TimeUnit) > > JiangHaiting <jianghait...@foxmail.com> 于2021年10月26日周二 上午10:19写道: > > > Can this method > > "org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.ConsumerBase#getTotalIncomingMessages" do > > the trick? Though you have to change the type to ConsumerBase. > > > > > > And maybe `peek` is more suitable and useful to add to the Consumer > > interface? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------ Original ------------------ > > From: > > "dev" > > < > > shoot...@gmail.com>; > > Date: Mon, Oct 25, 2021 07:24 PM > > To: "dev"<dev@pulsar.apache.org>; > > > > Subject: [DISCUSSION] PIP-108: Add method to help user judge if > > consumer queue has message > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/12479 > > > > --- Pasted here for quoting convenience --- > > > > ## Motivation > > Currently, I have an application that manages ten thousand of consumers, > > and a logic to schedule consumers's receive. It would be helpful to know if > > one of the consumers have message to recive. > > > > ## Goal > > To make `Consumer` can judge if there are unreceiving messages > > > > ## API Changes > > > > Add `hasMessageInReceiverQueue` on the `Consumer` interface. > > > > ## Implementation > > > > For `ZeroQueueConsumerImpl` return false, Others, judge the > > `receiveQueueSize` greater than zero. > > > > > > ## Reject Alternatives > > > > No alternatives yet. > > > > > > > > > > --- > > Thanks, > > Haiting Jiang (Github: Jason918)