Hi Enrico Sorry for the late reply, I have been on vacation for the past few days. I noticed some PRs in 2.9 already approved and It's not a long time no one pays attention to, I think we should contain these PRs in 2.9.0 1. https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12034, 2. https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12056(already approved), https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12066(you have a change request), https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12072(the author already mentioned should be contained in 2.9.0) 3. https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12245
And some transaction fixes https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pulls/assigned/congbobo184 which are important in 2.9.0, I think we should wait for a while for the fixes, Bo Cong is fixing the comments. I think we can wait another 1-2 weeks and some important PRs we can ping the author or the reviewers to try to complete it in 2.9. Thanks, Penghui On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:40 PM Yunze Xu <y...@streamnative.io.invalid> wrote: > Just a reminder of review for PIP 96: > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12088 < > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12088> > > And I’ve pinged reviewers again just now. > > Thanks, > Yunze > > > 2021年10月4日 下午3:01，Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> 写道： > > > > > > > > There are a few approved PIP that needs review and merging. > > > > Please let me know for any blocker. > > > > Tomorrow, Tuesday, I will move every pending issue and PR scheduled for > > 2.9.0 to 2.10.0. > > > > If the owner of the PR or issue really thinks that we must include that > in > > 2.9.0 please let us know here on dev@ > > > > We must try to stick to the Schedule this time, and we are already late > (1 > > week according to GitHub) > > > > CI is in quite good shape, > > but there are a few flaky tests, especially in the C client. > > I don't consider this a blocker, but if you have time to help in > > fixing this it will be great ! > > > > Best regards > > Enrico > >
