Il giorno mar 31 ago 2021 alle ore 08:28 Anonymitaet _ < anonymita...@hotmail.com> ha scritto:
> Hi Pulsar enthusiasts, > > > > Thanks for your support! > > > > Since we have reached a consensus, we are considering implementing Bot to > Pulsar using GitHub Bot <https://github.com/xuexb/github-bot>. The > general steps are as follows: > > 1. Start an HTTP server based on koajs on the server. > 2. Establish some project specifications (such as pull request format, > configure some owners with specified labels, etc.). > 3. Let the Bot (usually a separate account) automatically handle some > things based on GitHub webhooks and GitHub API. > > > > These procedures make us think about the following questions. Can anyone > help answer? Thank you very much! > > 1. **Will the Pulsar community provide an email account to the Bot? ** > So that we can register the bot with the email address. > > We can create a dedicated mailing list for this, like d...@pulsar.apache.org . But we need the PMC to agree on this, I am not sure about the procedure to follow (@Matteo ?) > > 1. > 2. As instructed by step a), **will the Pulsar community assign some > resources (for example, a Linux server) to run the Bot? ** > > Can this run as a GitHub bot ? Otherwise it will be something that is hard to maintain, btw we can ask Apache INFRA for a simple VM, I am not sure about Security risks, adding a new machine means adding something to protect and to maintain. Especially if this machine will have some special permission to act on the repository. If we could have something like a batch scheduled job that scans the PRs and does the work it would be very easier. It could run on GH actions or on ASF Jenkins > > 1. > 2. As instructed by step c), the Bot needs some permissions to manage > the Pulsar project (for example, it needs access to use “Manage access” and > “Webhooks” features in “Settings”), **will the Pulsar community grant > those access to the Bot?** > > We can do this But the critical point is to decide where this bot should live. Enrico > > 1. > > > > Tao & Anonymitaet > > > > *From: *Guangning E <eguangn...@gmail.com> > *Reply-To: *"us...@pulsar.apache.org" <us...@pulsar.apache.org> > *Date: *Monday, August 30, 2021 at 15:15 > *To: *"us...@pulsar.apache.org" <us...@pulsar.apache.org> > *Cc: *Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org>, "dev@pulsar.apache.org" < > dev@pulsar.apache.org>, "fengtao...@bupt.edu.cn" <fengtao...@bupt.edu.cn> > *Subject: *Re: [Workflow] Introduce Bot to Improve Efficiency > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > Guangning > > > > Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> 于2021年8月30日周一 下午3:07写道： > > +1 > > good idea to have a bot, otherwise I see much time wasted by you in always > asking the same things. > > I appreciate very much your efforts > > > > Probably this document fits well to be listed in the PIPs page, it is not > about code but about community/project management > > @Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org> what do you think? > > > > > > > > Enrico > > > > Il giorno lun 30 ago 2021 alle ore 02:55 Anonymitaet _ < > anonymita...@hotmail.com> ha scritto: > > Hi Pulsar enthusiasts, > > > > To improve doc workflow efficiency, we want to introduce Bot to Pulsar > community. > > > > To make things clear, we’ve written a proposal and recorded a demo. > > - [Discussion] Introduce Bot to Improve Doc Workflow Efficiency > > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bQfZkSu5nG1tNycpmXXtUFn-Z5-h-uqHv6IXsCEySQ8/edit> > - [Demo] How Bot Improves Doc Workflow Efficiency > > <https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1a0erKa2KN81LYR-a5EvBlsaoQA2t9i1Y> > > > > We’d love your feedback! Feel free to comment *before EOD Sep 2 GMT+8*. Many > thanks! > > > > Tao & Anonymitaet > > > > > >
