I wouldn't mind if we could include the debug statements from PR #10217 (
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/10217) as part of this release,
though I realize that PR #10217 is currently tagged for 2.8.0.
I'm just waiting to get the flaky tests to clear. I expect them to clear
after a couple of additional test runs.

--
Devin G. Bost

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021, 12:14 AM Michael Marshall <mikemars...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 for releasing 2.7.2.
>
> The work for graceful broker shutdown appears to be almost complete:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/10199. I would really like to get
> that included in this release, if possible, as it should improve user
> experience on platforms like kubernetes.
>
> I read through the titles of the other open PRs from the past month, and it
> does not appear to me that any other PRs are essential to include in this
> patch release.
>
> Thanks for volunteering to manage this release, Enrico.
>
> Regards,
> Michael Marshall
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 3:53 AM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I haven't heard any other opinion from the community, but I assume
> > that it is fine to proceed with the release at this point.
> >
> > First of all I will double check that every PR/issue that is marked
> > for 2.7.2 has been cherry-picked
> >
> > Please do not commit anything to branch-2.7 and ping me for every
> > activity related to branch-2.7
> >
> > When branch-2.7 is ready for a release I will follow the procedure here
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/Release-process
> >
> > Regards
> > Enrico
> >
> > Il giorno dom 11 apr 2021 alle ore 17:58 Joshua Odmark
> > <j...@pandio.com> ha scritto:
> > >
> > > Thank you enrico.
> > >
> > > Yes, I have tested it extensively.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 8:47 AM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Joshua,
> > > > I have pinged the reviewers for 8957.
> > > > If there is no incompatibility with branch-2.7 then we can
> cherry-pick
> > it.
> > > >
> > > > Just for curiosity are you already testing it somewhere on 2.7.x ?
> > > >
> > > > Enrico
> > > >
> > > > Il giorno dom 11 apr 2021 alle ore 11:48 Joshua Odmark
> > > > <j...@pandio.com> ha scritto:
> > > > >
> > > > > I would like to respectfully request this be added as well. I was
> > > > expecting
> > > > > to see it in 2.7.1.
> > > > >
> > > > > It is a major bug that prevents using third party proxy providers
> > with
> > > > > pulsar, and the fix is simple.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/8957
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you!
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 2:23 AM Enrico Olivelli <
> eolive...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > during the discussion started by Michal Marshall, two weeks ago
> [1]
> > > > > > we talked about cutting 2.7.2 release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here [2] you can find the list of commits cherry-picked to
> > branch-2.7
> > > > > > since 2.7.1 release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would like to volunteer as a release manager and to learn how
> to
> > > > > > release Pulsar if no one else wants to do it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Enrico
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r70bd56cd447a92c0264314c74313ed23ca45ed254f1abc932816a34f%40%3Cdev.pulsar.apache.org%3E
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/compare/v2.7.1...branch-2.7
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
>

Reply via email to