Thanks for the instruction, I’ll take a look later.

Regards
Yunze Xu

> 2021年4月6日 上午1:38,Devin Bost <devin.b...@gmail.com> 写道:
> 
> Check out the instructions by Lari Hotari here about how to setup your
> personal Github CI:
> https://markmail.org/message/xapp7aguh44osqhm
> 
> I've been working through similar issues as I've been facing a
> NullPointerException (in a PR of mine) that consistently occurs in Github
> but never occurs locally.
> 
> I tried using Act (https://github.com/nektos/act) to emulate the
> environment but ran into different issues, probably permission related.
> 
> --
> Devin G. Bost
> 
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2021, 10:51 AM Yunze Xu <y...@streamnative.io.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> This flaky test have existed for a long time, even before I contributed my
>> first PR to Pulsar. I’ve been looking into the problem for several times
>> but all blocked for that I cannot reproduce it in my local environment.
>> 
>> From the code and logs, it looks like the cleanup phase encountered a
>> segmentation fault, which may be caused by a possible null pointer
>> accession in multi-thread test environment with
>> https://github.com/google/gtest-parallel <
>> https://github.com/google/gtest-parallel>. However, I still cannot
>> reproduce it with the same command of CI.
>> 
>> I just want to have a CI environment to test my ideas, but you know, the
>> Pulsar’s workflows cost too much time, a tiny change may wait too long. Is
>> there any way to run similar CI in my own repo and verify if the change
>> could fix the flaky test?
>> 
>> Regards
>> Yunze Xu
>> 
>>> 2021年4月2日 下午3:09,Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> 写道:
>>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> We have this BasicEndToEndTest.testLookupThrottling CPP test that is
>> very flaky
>>> 
>>> We already created two issues about it
>>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/6301
>>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/6267
>>> 
>>> Is there any expert of the CPP client that can help in fixing this?
>>> In my experience I see it failing very often on CI
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> Enrico
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to