I am still new to the community. Please bear with me. I am fine with not upgrading BK
But I would like to understand why we do not want the upgrade from BK 4.12 to 4.12 for 2.7.1 when we committed to upgrade from BK 4.10 to 4.11 on brach-2.6 for Pulsar 2.6.3 https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/8604 The changes from 4.10 to 4.11 are pretty important, but there is no such much difference between 4.12 to 4.13, if we keep ZooKeeper 3.5 Regards Enrico Il giorno lun 1 mar 2021 alle ore 22:03 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > +1 > > Yeah, let's avoid bumping the major version of dependencies in a > minor/patch release. > > - Sijie > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 3:36 AM Yong Zhang <zhangyong1025...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks Michael for taking the fix into branch 2.7! > > > > The Bookkeeper 4.13.0 is a major release so I would suggest releasing it > > with > > Pulsar 2.8.0. And it's been a long time since we released the 2.7.0 so we > > can > > release Pulsar 2.8.0 at the end of March. > > > > Yong > > > > On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 02:18, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > We have recently released Bookkeeper 4.13.0. > > > The contents of the release are mostly about making 'stable' the stream > > > storage service, that is fundamental for Pulsar Stateful Functions. > > > In order to make the BK stream service more stable we had to upgrade > > GRPC. > > > > > > I would like to know that you think about upgrading to BK 4.13.0 not only > > > for master branch but also on 2.7.1. > > > The motivation would be to make the Stateful Functions more stable and > > let > > > more users use it in production with 2.7 without waiting for 2.8 > > (timeline > > > is unknown and there is still lot of in progress work to be done) > > > > > > One point about not upgrading would be that BK is now shipping with ZK > > > 3.6.2 by default and I am sure we don't want to upgrade ZK dependency in > > a > > > point release (we are on ZK 3.5). > > > But BK is not really using any ZK 3.6 features so it will work with ZK > > 3.5 > > > client without problems. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > Enrico > > > > > > Il Dom 28 Feb 2021, 07:31 Michael Marshall <mikemars...@gmail.com> ha > > > scritto: > > > > > > > There is a memory leak in 2.7.0 detailed in issue > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/9725. > > > > > > > > I have a fix (or at least part of a fix) for master as well as > > > branch-2.7: > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/9751 > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/9752 > > > > > > > > It's a simple fix (just needed to call release on an entry). We > > > > should include this in the 2.7.1 release. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Michael Marshall > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 2:01 AM Jinfeng Huang > > > <h...@streamnative.io.invalid > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > That's kind reminder, thank you Yong~ > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > Jennifer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 4:59 PM Yong Zhang < > > zhangyong1025...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you guys. > > > > > > > > > > > > I am clean up the PRs which are marked with the label > > > `release/2.7.1`. > > > > > > If you have PR which marked the `release/2.7.1`, please take a look > > > > > > and make it merged as soon as possible, otherwise, it will be > > pushed > > > > > > into the next release. > > > > > > Thanks for your help! > > > > > > > > > > > > Yong Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 at 15:38, Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jia Zhai > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Beijing, China > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mobile: +86 15810491983 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 1:20 PM Michael Marshall < > > > > > mikemars...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1, thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 7:06 PM Renkai Ge < > > gaelook...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2021年2月17日 下午3:12，Yong Zhang <y...@apache.org> 写道： > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you've all been doing well. It has been two months > > > since > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > released > > > > > > > > > > the Apache Pulsar > > > > > > > > > > 2.7.0. We have a lot of fixes already merged. So I would > > like > > > > to > > > > > > > start > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > prepare our next patch > > > > > > > > > > release in the next few days. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can find the whole change list of the 2.7.1 release > > from: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pulls?q=is%3Apr+label%3Arelease%2F2.7.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I missed some features, please let me know. And if some > > > PRs > > > > > > can't > > > > > > > > > > complete in a few days, > > > > > > > > > > the owner can help check if we should include them in 2.7.1 > > > or > > > > > push > > > > > > > > them > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > the next release version. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Yong > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
