Hi Apache Pulsar enthusiasts, Recent growth has put the spotlight on Pulsar. While most of the news on Pulsar has been instructive, not all coverage of Pulsar has been accurate. Today, we are excited to share our response to a recent Confluent blog comparing Kafka, Pulsar, and RabbitMQ. This post will be the first in a two-part series and today we will concentrate on the differences between Pulsar and Kafka in terms of performance, architecture, and features.
As we know, Pulsar offers many advantages that make it an attractive choice for companies seeking to adopt a unified messaging and event streaming platform. Compared with Kafka, Pulsar is more resilient and less complex to operate and scale and it covers all the fundamentals necessary for building event streaming applications and incorporates many built-in features with a rich set of tools. Check it out: https://streamnative.io/blog/tech/pulsar-vs-kafka-part-1. [image: image.png] Yu
