2019-10-30 09:29:57 UTC - Florentin Dubois: Hello! I have written a pulsar 
improvement proposal (pip) about the admin api, I would like to have some 
feedback/review about it before do something 
<https://gist.github.com/FlorentinDUBOIS/4f98c0f71bf6514309b0414290b48e6a> 
:smile: @xiaolong.ran @Sijie Guo @jia zhai
100 : Sijie Guo, xiaolong.ran
+1 : xiaolong.ran
----
2019-10-30 09:33:30 UTC - Sijie Guo: @Florentin Dubois Can you also send it to 
the <mailto:dev@pulsar.apache.org|dev@pulsar.apache.org> mailing list as well?
----
2019-10-30 09:35:31 UTC - Florentin Dubois: of course
----
2019-10-30 09:48:11 UTC - Sijie Guo: @Florentin Dubois: PIP-47 was used
----
2019-10-30 09:48:22 UTC - Sijie Guo: I copied you proposal to Pulsar wiki and 
use PIP-48
----
2019-10-30 09:48:39 UTC - Florentin Dubois: Thanks :slightly_smiling_face:
----
2019-10-30 09:49:49 UTC - Sijie Guo: 
<https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/PIP-48:-hierarchical-admin-api>
heart : Florentin Dubois, Yuvaraj Loganathan, xiaolong.ran
----
2019-10-30 14:08:57 UTC - Matteo Merli: @Florentin Dubois thanks for the 
proposal. I have few comments on it, can you send to the dev list so that we 
can start a thread there?
----
2019-10-30 14:24:22 UTC - Florentin Dubois: @Matteo Merli I already sent it to 
<mailto:dev@pulsar.apache.org|dev@pulsar.apache.org> mailing list, if it is 
that you mean?
----
2019-10-30 14:37:34 UTC - Matteo Merli: Got it, prob it’s still in moderation 
queue 
----
2019-10-30 16:21:49 UTC - Addison Higham: IDK if this is a better conversation 
for the dev mailing list or here in slack... but some thoughts on the admin API:
Any consideration about making a grpc interface? With the usage of protobuf 
already in the project and with work ongoing like the go-lang admin API, it has 
me wondering if considering moving towards grpc might really help. Obviously 
leave the existing HTTP API in place... but if you are going to do a new 
version....
----
2019-10-30 16:26:07 UTC - Sijie Guo: personally I like gRPC 
:slightly_smiling_face:
----
2019-10-31 04:23:41 UTC - xiaolong.ran: Hello @Matteo Merli  If time is 
convenient, please rebase master code, thanks. 
<https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/5232>
----
2019-10-31 05:41:51 UTC - Matteo Merli: No rebase is required there
----
2019-10-31 05:42:59 UTC - xiaolong.ran: 
<https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/5022>
----
2019-10-31 05:43:25 UTC - xiaolong.ran: Sorry, I sent the wrong link
----
2019-10-31 06:14:58 UTC - Matteo Merli: Ok, that’s a bit dependant on 
<https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/5278> too.
----
2019-10-31 06:15:43 UTC - Matteo Merli: It might slip to 2.5 if I cannot get 
these 2 ready before the BK release is available
----
2019-10-31 06:16:16 UTC - xiaolong.ran: :ok_hand:
----
2019-10-31 06:37:04 UTC - Zabas: @Zabas has joined the channel
----
2019-10-31 06:41:52 UTC - xiaolong.ran: 
<https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/5491> @Penghui Li have addressed your 
comments, please take a look again, thanks
----

Reply via email to