+1 from me as well. I think Terraform is a good and well adopted option for simplifying state management, and I can easily see the benefit of having a provider for Polaris, in helping manage resources exposed via Polaris Management API.
Cheers, Sung On 2026/07/07 10:42:57 Nándor Kollár wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Agreeing with what Yufei said, I also think that a Terraform provider > for Polaris is a good idea. We already ship a Helm chart with the > releases, but no Terraform provider is available yet. > > Thanks, > Nandor > > Yufei Gu <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2026. júl. 7., K, 0:26): > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > +1 from me, I'd definitely welcome a dedicated Terraform provider for > > Polaris. I think it would make deploying and managing Polaris easier. > > Thanks for volunteering to drive this effort. Happy to help review PRs > > along the way. > > > > Thanks, > > Yufei > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2026 at 11:22 AM Alex Stephen via dev > > <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > The Apache Iceberg project has been working on a Terraform Provider > > > <https://github.com/apache/terraform-provider-iceberg>. We're hoping to > > > release it soon. We originally accepted some PRs for Polaris-based > > > resources (Polaris Principals mainly), but the community decided we should > > > focus exclusively on Iceberg resources. > > > > > > We'd like to rehome the Polaris resources into a dedicated Polaris > > > Terraform Provider. I'm more than happy to dedicate time to making this > > > happen. It would need to live in a dedicated repository called > > > "terraform-provider-polaris," since the Terraform Registry is > > > opinionated about that. > > > > > > Is this something the community is interested in? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > -- Alex Stephen > > > > > > > -- > Kollár Nándor >
