Hi all, If 1.5.0 includes Iceberg 1.11, let’s not forget to incorporate the changes already merged in the feature/iceberg-1.11 branch. There also might be one or two PRs against that branch that could now be merged (I’m AFK at the moment).
Thanks, Alex Le mer. 6 mai 2026 à 07:10, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> a écrit : > Thanks a good point but I would say let's go best effort: if we can > integrate Iceberg 1.11.0 for Polaris 1.5.0, we will do that, but we should > not wait. > If it's not in Polaris 1.5.0, Iceberg 1.11.0 can be integrated in Polaris > 1.6.0 (in June). > > Regards > JB > > On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 6:40 PM Ajantha Bhat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi JB, > > > > It looks like we’re very close to the Iceberg 1.11.0 release based on > this > > thread <https://lists.apache.org/thread/z6krfw87qft21rt7nfrdh09qg2h03ryf > >. > > I’d suggest waiting for it to be included in the 1.5.0 release, which > > aligns with our timeline. > > > > - Ajantha > > > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 9:14 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi JB, > > > > > > Good idea! > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Dmitri. > > > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 11:37 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > As we discussed a few weeks ago, I propose releasing Polaris 1.5.0 > next > > > > week to maintain our monthly release cadence. > > > > > > > > We currently have nine open issues for this milestone: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20milestone%3A1.5.0 > > > > > > > > I am starting with issue #4367 ( > > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/4367) to verify all legal > > > aspects > > > > before the release. > > > > > > > > Please update any issues or PRs you would like to include in 1.5.0. I > > > plan > > > > to begin the release preparation on May 15 if no objections. > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > JB > > > > > > > > > >
