Hello,

Here is the sample PR: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/3929

Thanks,
Yong Zheng

On 2026/02/24 06:25:39 Yufei Gu wrote:
> Hi Yong, looking forward to a prototype.
> 
> I think maintaining backward compatibility is both preferable and realistic
> within a limited scope. Forward compatibility is much more challenging by
> nature.
> 
> In the worst case, users can always use the same version with the Polaris
> server, which is still practical for the CLI because it is released
> together with the server. For other components not releasing with the
> Polaris server, such as the MCP server, we will likely need a clear
> compatibility matrix documenting which versions work together.
> 
> Yufei
> 
> 
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 9:38 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Yong
> >
> > Thanks for starting this discussion.
> >
> > I'm in favor of anything that can improve user experience and onboarding.
> > I will take a look at the PR, it sounds reasonable to me.
> > I think we should be pragmatic and focus on user value. So, we should not
> > be too ambitious, and go step by step.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 7:38 AM Yong Zheng <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I created https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1474 a while back as a
> > > POV to show whether we should add functionality in the CLI to allow
> > > bootstrapping base Polaris entities for a given setup. This is very handy
> > > IMO when people need to bootstrap multiple catalogs while avoiding some
> > > local scripts or creating another internal tool for orchestration work to
> > > get Polaris to a working state when deploying to a new environment.
> > >
> > > From the POV, the discussion around that time was that polaris
> > > synchronizer (
> > >
> > https://github.com/apache/polaris-tools/tree/46fe5e057e617eecee4da41bc36791736e3c55de/polaris-synchronizer
> > )
> > > would take up these functionalities. However, that doesn't appear to be
> > in
> > > place as of today. Thus, I would like to get some feedback from the
> > > community on whether we should proceed with adding this functionality
> > into
> > > the CLI.
> > >
> > > I really like the philosophy of declarative automation. Perhaps we can
> > > implement it with a lightweight declarative reconciler for bootstrap.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Yong Zheng
> > >
> >
> 

Reply via email to