I generally thought a +1 here is basically a go ahead to merge the PR whenever it has sufficient reviews as we have approved the concept.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 1:09 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Yun, > > Thanks for opening the spec change PR! > > I wonder if this vote call might have been a bit premature... before the PR > received reviews in GH... In any case I left some comments in GH. > > Voting -1 (binding) for now as explained in GH comments. Will update my > vote after GH comments are discussed. > > Cheers, > Dmitri. > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 8:19 PM yun zou <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Given the growing interest in Generic Table, I propose adding credential > > vending support to further enhance its data governance capabilities. > > > > The detailed discussion has taken place in a separate thread. I would now > > like to call for a vote to adopt the storage credential API > specification, > > which clearly documents the storage configurations supported by Polaris > in > > its description. > > > > Thank you all for your reviews and feedback. > > > > Please refer to the link below for additional details: > > - Spec change PR: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/3826 > > - Related Issue: https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/3020 > > - Discussion thread: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/9y0xnjfn4n06svkt657gcsplk6sc7dhf > > > > Please vote in the next 72 hours: > > [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns > > > > Best Regards, > > Yun > > >
