Hi all, Thanks to everyone for the feedback.
Regarding user awareness: we've added a note to the changelog under "Upgrade Notes": > The Helm chart now includes a JSON schema file for easy validation of values > files. Because types are now validated, existing values files may need to be > updated to match the new schema. I'm open to reclassifying this as a "breaking change" if people think it's necessary. I think the "breaking" nature is debatable, but I'm fine with making the change. FYI I may merge the PR in the interim though because I have more PRs waiting on that one, but I can change the wording in the changelog in a follow-up PR to reflect the community's opinion. Thanks, Alex On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 10:23 AM Nándor Kollár <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 for JSON schema, I think it is a good idea to add validation on Helm > values. > > Nandor > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2026. febr. 18., > Sze, 9:48): > > > Hi, > > > > +1 for the PR and including it in the 1.4.0-incubating release. > > > > Since this is a significant change, should we add a specific note for Helm > > users in the release notes? > > > > Regards, > > JB > > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 2:47 PM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I recently opened a PR that introduces support for JSON schema in the > > > Polaris Helm chart: > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/3759 > > > > > > While the feature per se is, I believe, quite consensual, it's also a > > > significant change. Besides, it would be released with the upcoming > > > 1.4.0 release, so I wanted to draw the community's attention to it > > > before merging the PR. > > > > > > If you have any comments or remarks please leave them directly in the PR. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Alex > > > > >
