Hi Sung,

I added a few rather random comments to the PR... How would you like to
proceed? Are we still collecting comments on the doc at this stage?

Do you think code work / reviews can begin for real?

Thanks,
Dmitri.

On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 1:23 PM Michael Collado <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Left some comments. Overall, I'm in favor of decoupling the authn entity
> resolution from the authorization process.
>
> Mike
>
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2026 at 4:29 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Sung,
> >
> > I went through the doc and left a few minor comments. Overall, it feels
> > like the right direction for the Authorizer refactoring.
> >
> > Thanks for diligent backward compatibility considerations!
> >
> > I'll check the PR out next week (hopefully on Mon).
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Dmitri.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 10:20 PM Sung Yun <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I’ve put together an updated RFC[1] on refactoring the
> > > PolarisAuthorizer SPI and would appreciate community review and
> > > feedback.
> > >
> > > The RFC builds on the recent community sprint discussion[2] and pivots
> > > slightly from the previous RFC[3] to propose an incremental path to
> > > better support external PDP-backed authorizers, while keeping existing
> > > RBAC behavior and resolver semantics intact. It also outlines a
> > > multi-phase implementation plan and calls out a few longer-term
> > > questions around evolving the SPI from here.
> > >
> > > I'm looking forward to your feedback!
> > >
> > > Once it is reviewed and if there is support for this RFC in the
> > > mailing list, I'd like to proceed to break up the proposal into
> > > individual PRs corresponding to each implementation phase and start
> > > contributing incremental changes.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Sung
> > >
> > > [1] RFC:
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OaiQG_C4-yUe0ihaDBxtw_mEcOOzUBnWPazzVbjQi5U/edit?tab=t.0
> > > [2] Community Sprint Notes:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cUg4HnUGDN0JKMr0JWQTaKkgzSXENHZ4VMuyRfJ9oTQ/edit?tab=t.lzwxdgyu5e82#heading=h.jax6biqfrx3x
> > > [3] Previous RFC (Withdrawn):
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vV4p35feUqrEuG4ciZ2ccPJTli1tR4c9YD4M_2Bi0Wc/edit?tab=t.0
> > >
> >
>


-- 
Dmitri Bourlatchkov
Senior Staff Software Engineer, Dremio
Dremio.com
<https://www.dremio.com/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=signature&utm_term=na&utm_content=email-signature&utm_campaign=email-signature>
/
Follow Us on LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/company/dremio> / Get
Started <https://www.dremio.com/get-started/>


The Agentic Lakehouse
The only lakehouse built for agents, managed by agents

Reply via email to