Site note, looking at https://artifacthub.io/packages/helm/apache-polaris/polaris, it is a big ugly as we are putting a lot contents there and the license header/huge specific contents are messing the public page up on artifacthuh. Currently our chart README.md is also being used as a page for Hugo on public facing site. Maybe we should consider using two different pages for it? The main README.md will be simple which will be used by artifacthub and the detail page will then replace our current helm page on public site.
Thanks, Yong Zheng On 2026/02/10 03:50:49 Yong Zheng wrote: > Please add me as well. > > Thanks, > Yong Zheng > > > On 2026/02/09 17:51:13 Alexandre Dutra wrote: > > Hi JB, hi all, > > > > I went ahead and created an organization "Apache Polaris" on Artifact > > Hub. I can invite people to the org; if other PPMC members want to be > > invited, just let me know. > > > > Here is our Apache Polaris page on Artifact Hub: > > > > https://artifacthub.io/packages/helm/apache-polaris/polaris > > > > But we have issues with the chart README rendering it seems. I think > > it's caused by the Hugo site header, mostly. There seems to be no way > > to edit it in Artifact Hub. > > > > I'd suggest revisiting this README completely for the next release. > > > > Thanks, > > Alex > > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 5:52 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Yes, please do (as PPMC member). > > > > > > Regards > > > JB > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 5:35 PM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi JB, > > > > > > > > So, can any contributor just go ahead and create an account on > > > > Artifact Hub, then declare the `apache-polaris` repo ID? > > > > > > > > If so, I'm happy to do it. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 5:27 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > If there's no need to have an account for the release process, no > > > > > need to > > > > > have the ASF Infra. > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > JB > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 4:12 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi JB, > > > > > > > > > > > > Would it still be the Infra team who opens and manges the Polaris > > > > account > > > > > > on Artifact Hub or PPMC? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Dmitri. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 7:19 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ah ok. I thought that we need an account to “link” to our > > > > > > > repository. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Good then. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > JB > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le lun. 9 févr. 2026 à 13:17, Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> > > > > > > > a > > > > > > écrit > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi JB, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think with Artifact Hub the workflow is different: we don't > > > > > > > > need > > > > to > > > > > > > > "push" anything to Artifact Hub during the release, so > > > > > > > > credentials > > > > are > > > > > > > > not required at that moment. The chart stays hosted where it is > > > > today, > > > > > > > > and Artifact Hub would "discover" it thanks to the chart > > > > annotations > > > > > > > > and the artifacthub-repo.yml file. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 12:59 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To be part of the automatic release, I guess we should ask > > > > > > > > > infra > > > > to > > > > > > > > create > > > > > > > > > an account and give us via secret (as we do for DockerHub). > > > > > > > > > It’s basically similar to what we do for DockerHub and PyPi > > > > (external > > > > > > > > > resources from The ASF, ASF deals with Nexus and dist). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > JB > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le lun. 9 févr. 2026 à 11:37, Alexandre Dutra > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > a > > > > > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A new PR is proposing to reference the Polaris Helm chart on > > > > > > Artifact > > > > > > > > Hub > > > > > > > > > > [1]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think the idea is great, but since it requires some > > > > coordination > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > changes to the release process, I thought it would be good > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > discuss > > > > > > > > > > this idea here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The changes in the PR are just the first step. After that 2 > > > > more > > > > > > > steps > > > > > > > > > > would be required: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Registration: someone in the team must manually register > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > Polaris Helm repository in Artifact Hub. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) The semi-automated release scripts would need to be > > > > modified, > > > > > > > > > > notably to copy the new artifacthub-repo.yml file to the > > > > > > > > > > Helm > > > > chart > > > > > > > > > > repository root (at the same level as index.yaml). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There might be more steps involved that I'm not aware of. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you all think? Should we proceed with this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/3545 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
