Hi Robert, Thanks so much for driving this! The direction looks great, having a unified but tool-agnostic release flow will make things much smoother for everyone.
Excited to see the detailed proposal and happy to help test things out once it’s ready. Yufei On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 10:26 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > The ability to release each tool individually is a great improvement! > > I agree that each tool should have its specific method for handling > release resources. > > Thanks, and I look forward to seeing the detailed proposal. > > Regards, > JB > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 3:23 AM Robert Stupp <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I think there is a way to have release automation for polaris-tools > > similar to the release automation for the polaris repo. > > > > UX change TL;DR: Start drafting a release with two input parameters: > > 1. Tool name > > 2. Tool version > > All other steps remain the same as for the polaris repo. > > > > The major implementation difference is that the polaris-tools > > workflows become agnostic to which artifacts a specific tool builds > > (Maven stuff, tarballs/zip, Python stuff, Docker images, Helm charts). > > > > The effort for each tool would be pretty low, a few very simple > > tool-specific shell scripts. > > > > I will come up with a more detailed proposal soon. > > > > Robert >
