+1 Thank you Jonas, for the initiative, I fully support PyPi publishing. It
is very convenient !

Best,
Prashant Singh

On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 9:55 AM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote:

> Jonas, thanks for kicking this off! This sounds like a great direction!
> Publishing the Python CLI to PyPI will definitely make installation much
> smoother and improve UX. Nightly builds on Test PyPI are also nice for
> faster iteration and early feedback.
> I’m fully supportive of moving forward with this plan and appreciate the
> clear proposal outlining the process. Looking forward to the follow-up
> [VOTE] threads!
> The process also depends on the vote of Pypi project name and tool name.
> Hopefully we can finalize these votes around the same timeline.
>
> Yufei
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 9:17 AM Honah J. <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I’d like to start a discussion about publishing the Apache Polaris Python
> > CLI to PyPI and providing nightly builds (test PyPi).
> >
> > The main goal is to make the CLI easier to install (pip install
> > <package_name>) and to align its release and distribution process with
> ASF
> > guidelines. I’ve drafted a proposal [1] that outlines the key
> requirements
> > and the high-level release process if we include the Python CLI in the
> next
> > release. The proposal also covers how we might set up nightly builds on
> > Test PyPI for early testing.
> >
> > While some details can be finalized later, I’d like to first gather
> > feedback on the overall direction — specifically, whether the community
> > agrees with publishing to PyPI and providing nightly builds.
> >
> > If there’s general agreement, I plan to open two separate [VOTE] threads
> to
> > formalize these decisions:
> > 1. Whether to the Python CLI to PyPI
> > 2. Whether to provide nightly build (publish to test PyPi)
> >
> > Please let me know what you think!
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gbKYnFftpq884GhJ59waHdfoQG6MrevVAVCspf3hbrk/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Jonas
> >
>

Reply via email to