JB would it be possible to join you for the release as an observer?  I got
a few code review comments that suggest the release guide is not 100% up to
date and I would like to compare it with what is done for 1.0.1 so that I
can update it.

--

Pierre


On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 5:39 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:

> Thanks everyone.
>
> We have a consensus on the 1.0.1-incubating release.
>
> I will move forward with the release.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 12:44 PM Alexandre Dutra <adu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 on the proposed plan, thanks JB!
> >
> > Alex
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 6:43 PM yun zou <yunzou.colost...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 on 1.0.1 with just helm fix.
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Yun
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 9:05 AM Prashant Singh
> > > <prashant.si...@snowflake.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 to 1.0.1 with just helm fix !
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 7:07 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <
> di...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > A 1.0.1 (patch) release from the 1.0.x branch with just helm fixes
> SGTM.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Dmitri.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 9:24 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> j...@nanthrax.net>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > That's a good call.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My idea here is to do 1.0.1 as soon as possible (focus with Helm
> Chart
> > > > > > fix) based on the 1.0.x branch, and keep the 1.1.0 release for
> > > > > > mid-august (as proposed) from the main branch where we can
> include
> > > > > > Minio support, etc.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > JB
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 2:49 PM Robert Stupp <sn...@snazy.de>
> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > we can also do another "full" release from main and just call
> it
> > > > > > > "1.1.0", even if there's "not much new in it". But I think
> even that
> > > > > > > "not much" is more than what people would expect from a
> "point" or
> > > > > > > "dot" or "patch" release (bug and security fixes).
> > > > > > > Mean, we already have some support for Minio, which alone
> justifies
> > > > 1.1
> > > > > > IMO.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Guess, this could also be a "dry exercise" for the
> release-automation
> > > > > > > work that Pierre's doing - like running the steps that the
> automation
> > > > > > > would run.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Robert
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 2:34 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> > > > j...@nanthrax.net>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi folks,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Following the discussion about Helm Chart
> > > > > > > > (
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/xlfmtrhnx0k0wo8rysqwhmgq3dygnnrl
> > > > ),
> > > > > > > > I'm volunteering to release Apache Polaris 1.0.1-incubating.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This release will include the fix on Helm Chart.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The 1.0.1 release will be based on the 1.0.x branch, I will
> check
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > > the fix about Helm Chart is on the branch.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In terms of plans, I propose:
> > > > > > > > 1. I will create the 1.0.1 milestone on GH
> > > > > > > > 2. I will double check the Helm Chart fix is actually
> present on
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > 1.0.x branch
> > > > > > > > 3. If you have quick fixes to include on 1.0.1 (only
> emergency or
> > > > > > > > small fixes), feel free to do so
> > > > > > > > 4. I will submit the 1.0.1 release to vote
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If no objection, I'm ready to do 1.0.1 tonight (my time).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thoughts ?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > > JB
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
>

Reply via email to