Good question Mark -- I think there's likely a test gap here since this should have failed CI. The docs also work for me locally. I only noticed an issue when I started to see Hugo failures for unrelated PRs. It looks like we also have #2087 in which case #2086 will not be necessary.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 7:47 AM Mark Hoerth <mhoe...@dremio.com.invalid> wrote: > Thanks, Eric, for this step. When I build the page in my sandbox, I still > don't see the issue, and I guess that's because of the new addition of the > 1.0 directory. How should I avoid this issue next time > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 6:59 AM eric-maynard (via GitHub) <g...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > eric-maynard opened a new pull request, #2086: > > URL: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2086 > > > > In #2013 we added a new doc page, but it looks like an undetected > > conflict with #2033 occurred and the new doc page needs to be moved into > a > > different directory. This should resolve hugo failures like [this one]( > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/actions/runs/16295223531/job/46015206905 > > ). > > > > > > -- > > This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. > > To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the > > URL above to go to the specific comment. > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@polaris.apache.org > > > > For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: > > us...@infra.apache.org > > > > >
