Hi Eric, This sounds like an interesting approach to me.
I wonder how much decision logic do you envision Polaris to perform for de-conflictling? Is it mostly approving based submitted "Writer" ID checks or will Polaris validate actual table changes? I added some comments to the doc too. Thanks, Dmitri. On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 6:33 PM Eric Maynard <eric.w.mayn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Wanted to share this short design doc > < > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tkqBOYtkcA7fbDmhIAE6_6Jmus5WwP6vS6jA_JHp4Ms > > > for > a simple method of allowing conflicting commits to both be committed. If > implemented, this would allow e.g. two writers doing append-only operations > to a table in Polaris to always succeed. > > If you're interested, please take a look. In the meantime, I'll be > preparing a small draft PR to serve as a reference implementation. > > --EM >
